【推荐】ESG与欧盟的金融科技融资(英)VIP专享VIP免费

1
ESG AND FINTECH FUNDING IN THE EU
ANASTASIA GIAKOUMELOU a
*
ANTONIO SALVI b
*
STELIOS BEKIROS c
GRAZIA ONORATOd
a Ca' Foscari University of Venice, Venice, Italy (CORRESPONDING AUTHOR)
b University of Turin, Turin, Italy
c University of Turin, Turin, Italy
d University of Bari Aldo Moro, Italy
Abstract
The acronym FinTech, delineating financial technological innovation, altered the modus operandi of traditional banks
and intermediaries and gave rise to alternative providers in the FinTech realm. At the same time, the increasing
regulatory and market attention to environmental, social and governance (ESG) risks, changed the rules of traditional
finance.
This work investigates the impact of ESG on FinTech pricing. We analyze European FinTech firms to evaluate whether
superior sustainability profiles lead to higher valuations during funding rounds from 2014 to 2022. We find that ESG
reporting is positively related to capital raised, with investors addressing physical and transition risks and
demonstrating higher propensity for firms that appear to mitigate them. Lower trust in the relatively young FinTech
niche is confirmed by the signalling role ESG disclosure demonstrates, while finer shades of ESG profiling, such as
rankings and certifications that are also examined in this paper, remain of no impact.
Keywords: FinTech; ESG; physical risks; transition risks; firm value
All authors jointly declare that This research did not receive any specific grant from funding
agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
a* Department of Management, Ca' Foscari University of Venice, Italy, Tel: ++390412348701, Edward Wright Building S29, Email:
ana.giakoumelou@unive.it
b Department of Management, University of Turin, Via Verdi 8 - 10124 Torino, Italy, Tel: +3901167025902222; E-mail address:
antonio.salvi@unito.it
c Department Management, University of Turin, Via Verdi 8 - 10124 Torino, Italy, Tel: +3901167025902222; E-mail address: stelios.bekiros@unito.it
d Department of Economics, Management and Business Law, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Largo Abbazia Santa Scolastica, 53, 70125 Bari, Italy, Tel:
+393891719001; Email: grazia.onorato@uniba.it
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4488108
Preprint not peer reviewed
1
ESG AND FINTECH FUNDING IN THE EU
Abstract
The acronym FinTech, delineating financial technological innovation, altered the modus operandi of traditional banks and
intermediaries and gave rise to alternative providers in the FinTech realm. At the same time, the increasing regulatory and
market attention to environmental, social and governance (ESG) risks, changed the rules of traditional finance.
This work investigates the impact of ESG on FinTech pricing. We analyze European FinTech firms to evaluate whether
superior sustainability profiles lead to higher valuations during funding rounds from 2014 to 2022. We find that ESG
reporting is positively related to capital raised, with investors addressing physical and transition risks and demonstrating
higher propensity for firms that appear to mitigate them. Lower trust in the relatively young FinTech niche is confirmed
by the signalling role ESG disclosure demonstrates, while finer shades of ESG profiling, such as rankings and certifications
that are also examined in this paper, remain of no impact.
Keywords: FinTech; ESG; physical risks; transition risks; firm value
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4488108
Preprint not peer reviewed
2
Introduction
Already well into its third era, referred to as FinTech 3.0, financial innovation has reshaped the market
for financial services, a sector traditionally characterized by limited efficiency leaps and restricted
entry of new players (Philippon, 2016; Campanella et al., 2023). Traditional financial services are now
integrated with technology, while new services emerge through technological advancement (Liberti
and Petersen, 2019). The ongoing digital transformation of the economy has given birth to a new type
of institution that differs substantially from a traditional bank: the FinTech firm. The latter is a
prevalently young, fast-paced, highly technological and not always purely financial institution
(Murinde et al., 2022). The robust presence of FinTech firms in a changing industry, also in terms of
its demographic and consumption trends, is evident in the professional and academic debate’s focus
on the risk of displacement that traditional banking institutions run if they do not adapt to the new
digital and data-driven environment (Mills and McCarthy, 2017; Zetzsche et al., 2017).
The role of FinTech players in profoundly altering the current market is highlighted by a series of
recent studies that focus on the evolution of the sector in the post-pandemic era, indicating a strong
growth for FinTech corporate adoption rates in technology-driven transactions (Alawi et al., 2022;
Karim et al., 2022 a,b; Naeem et al., 2022 a,b). The post-pandemic economy, however, is not only
defined by digitalization but also by an equally dominant trend towards a sustainable transition through
environmental, social and governance (ESG) integration (Becker et al., 2022). In fact, among financial
trends that emerged after COVID-19, green and sustainable finance is most likely the strongest,
following the first ESG-related regulation after years of complete lack of standardization and law for
environmental and social disclosure. Policy makers identify finance as the key vessel to guide the
transition of the economy (Park and Kim, 2020), while the ESG integration is further backed by
corporate and retail demand (Quatrini, 2021). Van Tulder et al. (2021) sustain that the transition
towards a sustainable economic paradigm could generate $12 trillion of economic opportunities by
2030. A large number of global public and corporate entities are utilizing FinTech tools and services
on their sustainable transition (Baldassarre et al., 2020), while technology is considered crucial for the
creation of a green and inclusive framework as markets are driven by ESG concerns (Fernando et al.,
2019).
The heightened attention on sustainability has created a need for technological infrastructure to support
both corporations and investors; from the multifaceted assessment process to the lack of standardized,
reliable and objective ESG data, FinTech can play a big part in the transition economy (Huovila et al.,
2019; Rangu et al., 2022). FinTech can facilitate impact valuation for firms, as well as channel capital
towards more sustainable assets through artificial intelligence, blockchain and big data applications
(Mosteanu and Faccia, 2020). Corroborating this idea, FinTech is classified by the United Nations
(2019) as one of the innovations that can support the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and UN
2030 Agenda, as a booster for green development and social inclusion (Arner et al., 2015; Mirza et
al., 2023).
Despite what has been discussed so far, however, the fields of FinTech and sustainability have very
rarely been combined both in research and in policy making (Nassiry, 2018). More specifically, only
recently have regulators treated the two growing fields in a relatively unified manner. The EU's Fintech
Action Plan for a more competitive and innovative European financial sector (more recently, the
Digital Finance Strategy) and the Sustainable Finance Action Plan as of March 2018 represent
important pillars of the current European political agenda. European authorities recognize for the first
time the common characteristics and synergistic effects between ESG and digitization (Macpherson et
This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4488108
Preprint not peer reviewed
1ESGANDFINTECHFUNDINGINTHEEUANASTASIAGIAKOUMELOUaANTONIOSALVIbSTELIOSBEKIROSc†GRAZIAONORATOdaCa'FoscariUniversityofVenice,Venice,Italy(CORRESPONDINGAUTHOR)bUniversityofTurin,Turin,ItalycUniversityofTurin,Turin,ItalydUniversityofBariAldoMoro,ItalyAbstractTheacronymFinTech,delineatingfinancialtechnologicalinnovation,alteredthemodusoperandioftraditionalbanksandintermediariesandgaverisetoalternativeprovidersintheFinTechrealm.Atthesametime,theincreasingregulatoryandmarketattentiontoenvironmental,socialandgovernance(ESG)risks,changedtherulesoftraditionalfinance.ThisworkinvestigatestheimpactofESGonFinTechpricing.WeanalyzeEuropeanFinTechfirmstoevaluatewhethersuperiorsustainabilityprofilesleadtohighervaluationsduringfundingroundsfrom2014to2022.WefindthatESGreportingispositivelyrelatedtocapitalraised,withinvestorsaddressingphysicalandtransitionrisksanddemonstratinghigherpropensityforfirmsthatappeartomitigatethem.LowertrustintherelativelyyoungFinTechnicheisconfirmedbythesignallingroleESGdisclosuredemonstrates,whilefinershadesofESGprofiling,suchasrankingsandcertificationsthatarealsoexaminedinthispaper,remainofnoimpact.Keywords:FinTech;ESG;physicalrisks;transitionrisks;firmvalueAllauthorsjointlydeclarethatThisresearchdidnotreceiveanyspecificgrantfromfundingagenciesinthepublic,commercial,ornot-for-profitsectors.aDepartmentofManagement,Ca'FoscariUniversityofVenice,Italy,Tel:++390412348701,EdwardWrightBuildingS29,Email:ana.giakoumelou@unive.itbDepartmentofManagement,UniversityofTurin,ViaVerdi8-10124Torino,Italy,Tel:+3901167025902222;E-mailaddress:antonio.salvi@unito.itcDepartmentManagement,UniversityofTurin,ViaVerdi8-10124Torino,Italy,Tel:+3901167025902222;E-mailaddress:stelios.bekiros@unito.itdDepartmentofEconomics,ManagementandBusinessLaw,UniversityofBariAldoMoro,LargoAbbaziaSantaScolastica,53,70125Bari,Italy,Tel:+393891719001;Email:grazia.onorato@uniba.itThispreprintresearchpaperhasnotbeenpeerreviewed.Electroniccopyavailableat:https://ssrn.com/abstract=4488108Preprintnotpeerreviewed1ESGANDFINTECHFUNDINGINTHEEUAbstractTheacronymFinTech,delineatingfinancialtechnologicalinnovation,alteredthemodusoperandioftraditionalbanksandintermediariesandgaverisetoalternativeprovidersintheFinTechrealm.Atthesametime,theincreasingregulatoryandmarketattentiontoenvironmental,socialandgovernance(ESG)risks,changedtherulesoftraditionalfinance.ThisworkinvestigatestheimpactofESGonFinTechpricing.WeanalyzeEuropeanFinTechfirmstoevaluatewhethersuperiorsustainabilityprofilesleadtohighervaluationsduringfundingroundsfrom2014to2022.WefindthatESGreportingispositivelyrelatedtocapitalraised,withinvestorsaddressingphysicalandtransitionrisksanddemonstratinghigherpropensityforfirmsthatappeartomitigatethem.LowertrustintherelativelyyoungFinTechnicheisconfirmedbythesignallingroleESGdisclosuredemonstrates,whilefinershadesofESGprofiling,suchasrankingsandcertificationsthatarealsoexaminedinthispaper,remainofnoimpact.Keywords:FinTech;ESG;physicalrisks;transitionrisks;firmvalueThispreprintresearchpaperhasnotbeenpeerreviewed.Electroniccopyavailableat:https://ssrn.com/abstract=4488108Preprintnotpeerreviewed2IntroductionAlreadywellintoitsthirdera,referredtoasFinTech3.0,financialinnovationhasreshapedthemarketforfinancialservices,asectortraditionallycharacterizedbylimitedefficiencyleapsandrestrictedentryofnewplayers(Philippon,2016;Campanellaetal.,2023).Traditionalfinancialservicesarenowintegratedwithtechnology,whilenewservicesemergethroughtechnologicaladvancement(LibertiandPetersen,2019).Theongoingdigitaltransformationoftheeconomyhasgivenbirthtoanewtypeofinstitutionthatdifferssubstantiallyfromatraditionalbank:theFinTechfirm.Thelatterisaprevalentlyyoung,fast-paced,highlytechnologicalandnotalwayspurelyfinancialinstitution(Murindeetal.,2022).TherobustpresenceofFinTechfirmsinachangingindustry,alsointermsofitsdemographicandconsumptiontrends,isevidentintheprofessionalandacademicdebate’sfocusontheriskofdisplacementthattraditionalbankinginstitutionsruniftheydonotadapttothenewdigitalanddata-drivenenvironment(MillsandMcCarthy,2017;Zetzscheetal.,2017).TheroleofFinTechplayersinprofoundlyalteringthecurrentmarketishighlightedbyaseriesofrecentstudiesthatfocusontheevolutionofthesectorinthepost-pandemicera,indicatingastronggrowthforFinTechcorporateadoptionratesintechnology-driventransactions(Alawietal.,2022;Karimetal.,2022a,b;Naeemetal.,2022a,b).Thepost-pandemiceconomy,however,isnotonlydefinedbydigitalizationbutalsobyanequallydominanttrendtowardsasustainabletransitionthroughenvironmental,socialandgovernance(ESG)integration(Beckeretal.,2022).Infact,amongfinancialtrendsthatemergedafterCOVID-19,greenandsustainablefinanceismostlikelythestrongest,followingthefirstESG-relatedregulationafteryearsofcompletelackofstandardizationandlawforenvironmentalandsocialdisclosure.Policymakersidentifyfinanceasthekeyvesseltoguidethetransitionoftheeconomy(ParkandKim,2020),whiletheESGintegrationisfurtherbackedbycorporateandretaildemand(Quatrini,2021).VanTulderetal.(2021)sustainthatthetransitiontowardsasustainableeconomicparadigmcouldgenerate$12trillionofeconomicopportunitiesby2030.AlargenumberofglobalpublicandcorporateentitiesareutilizingFinTechtoolsandservicesontheirsustainabletransition(Baldassarreetal.,2020),whiletechnologyisconsideredcrucialforthecreationofagreenandinclusiveframeworkasmarketsaredrivenbyESGconcerns(Fernandoetal.,2019).Theheightenedattentiononsustainabilityhascreatedaneedfortechnologicalinfrastructuretosupportbothcorporationsandinvestors;fromthemultifacetedassessmentprocesstothelackofstandardized,reliableandobjectiveESGdata,FinTechcanplayabigpartinthetransitioneconomy(Huovilaetal.,2019;Ranguetal.,2022).FinTechcanfacilitateimpactvaluationforfirms,aswellaschannelcapitaltowardsmoresustainableassetsthroughartificialintelligence,blockchainandbigdataapplications(MosteanuandFaccia,2020).Corroboratingthisidea,FinTechisclassifiedbytheUnitedNations(2019)asoneoftheinnovationsthatcansupporttheSustainableDevelopmentGoals(SDGs)andUN2030Agenda,asaboosterforgreendevelopmentandsocialinclusion(Arneretal.,2015;Mirzaetal.,2023).Despitewhathasbeendiscussedsofar,however,thefieldsofFinTechandsustainabilityhaveveryrarelybeencombinedbothinresearchandinpolicymaking(Nassiry,2018).Morespecifically,onlyrecentlyhaveregulatorstreatedthetwogrowingfieldsinarelativelyunifiedmanner.TheEU'sFintechActionPlanforamorecompetitiveandinnovativeEuropeanfinancialsector(morerecently,theDigitalFinanceStrategy)andtheSustainableFinanceActionPlanasofMarch2018representimportantpillarsofthecurrentEuropeanpoliticalagenda.EuropeanauthoritiesrecognizeforthefirsttimethecommoncharacteristicsandsynergisticeffectsbetweenESGanddigitization(MacphersonetThispreprintresearchpaperhasnotbeenpeerreviewed.Electroniccopyavailableat:https://ssrn.com/abstract=4488108Preprintnotpeerreviewed3al.,2021),exploringthelinkbetweenFinTechandSustainableFinancethroughreferencedtotheeco-sustainablesegmentoftheformer(MacchiavelloandSiri,2020).Thispaperaimstobridgethegapincurrentliterature,combiningFinTechandsustainabilitytoexplorehowESGconsiderationsaffectFinTechfunding,aswellastheimpactofrecentregulationonfinancialmarketparticipants(FMPs,asreferredtowithintheSFDREUregulationforESGdisclosure).TheEUhasprovidedthefirstregulatoryframeworktargetingthereorientationofcapitalinordertofinancetheeconomy’stransitiontowardssustainability,increasetransparencyandstandardizationintermsofESGrisks,valuationandproductsanddealwithgreenwashing(PRI,2018).Infact,theEUisthefirstgeographicalblocktopresentauniformandwide-spectrumlegalframework,translatingthepledgesmadeinlinewiththeUN’sSDGsand2030Agendaintoregulationforbothcorporationsandfinancialmarketparticipants(banks,insurancecompanies,funds,assetmanagersandalternativeinvestmentservicesproviders).GiventherelativenoveltyofFinTechfirmsinthemarket,theirvaluationdriversremainwidelyunveiled,particularlysoinafieldthatisstillevolvingsuchasESGriskandvalueintegration.OurstudyfocusesonEUFinTechfirms,drawingfromthepeakedrelevanceoftheparticularmarketbeingthefirstgeographicalblocktopresentalegalframeworkforESG.ThispaperanalysesthesustainabilityprofileofEuropeanFinTechfirmsduringfundingrounds,withoutsegregatingthembyservicespecialization(insurance,loanprovision,directinvestmentservices).Wemakeseveralcontributionsofparticularsignificanceforinvestors,thefinancialservicesindustryandpolicymakers,highlightingtheneedforincreasedtransparencyintheindustryandthesignificanceofESGintegrationinthepricingmechanism,bothintermsofriskandvalueopportunities.Therestofthisstudyisorganizedasfollows.OursecondsectiondevelopsthetheoreticalframeworkandelaboratescurrentliteratureinthefieldofESGandFinTech,concludingwithourhypotheses.Following,wediscussoursampleandeconometricmodelandproceed,inourfourthsection,withtheempiricalfindingsofourresearch.Finally,wediscussourwork’spracticalimplicationsforthevariousstakeholdersintoday’seconomy.1.LiteratureReview1.1FinTechandESGAsbrieflyintroduced,thetwofieldsoffinancialtechnologiesandsustainabilityhaverarelybeencombined,despitetheirsynergisticpotential(Lishaetal.,2023).Fewstudiesdelveintotherelationshipbetweenenvironmentalexternalities,suchaspollutionlevels,andFinTech(MacchiavelloandSiri,2022;Irfanetal.,2022),theoreticallyexploringtherelationshipbetweentechnologyandsustainabilityinEurope.Similarly,CroutzetandDabbous(2021)findsupportforthepositiveroleofFinTechintriggeringrenewableenergyuseacrossOECDcountries.TheysuggestthatFinTechcanincentivizetheuseofrenewableenergyandhelpfunditsdevelopment,aswellasfacilitatethemanagementofgridsofsmallrenewableenergyprosumers.Accordingtotheirstudy,cryptocurrencies,suchasNRGcoin-ablockchain-basedcryptocurrencyforrenewableenergy,areanexampleofFinTechappliedtorenewableenergyuse.Similarly,MoroViscontiandMorea(2020)andLietal.(2022)investigateGreenFinTechanddemonstratealinkbetweengreenfinancingandsustainabledevelopment.Thosefindingsarecontradictedbystudiesontherelationshipbetweentechnologicallyadvancedfinancialproducts,especiallycryptocurrenciesthatarepoweredthroughhighenergyconsumption,andtheenvironment,whichfindthatenvironmentalexternalitiesgeneratedoutweighpotentialbenefits(Taoetal.,2022;Liuetal.,2022).Mirzaetal.(2023)suggestthatThispreprintresearchpaperhasnotbeenpeerreviewed.Electroniccopyavailableat:https://ssrn.com/abstract=4488108Preprintnotpeerreviewed4technologicalinnovationsoptimizevariousfunctionalaspectsofbankingfirmsandexpeditegreenfinancewhilesupportingbankprofitability.TheirpaperfocusesontheEuropeanbankingsectorandshowcasesapositiverelationshipbetweeninvestmentinFinTechandgreenlendingattributabletothesearch,diligence,andmonitoringefficiencyofnewtechnologies,aswellasimprovedrisk-adjustedreturnsoncapitalassociatedwithlowcost,expandedproductbase,andlowereconomiccapital.SimilarresultsarefoundbyYanetal.(2022),whorevealapositiveimpactofFinTechadoptiononthesustainabilityperformanceofbankinginstitutionsinanemergingeconomysuchasBangladesh.ResearchfocusedonChinahasfurthershowntheroleFinTechhasplayedinthereductionofgreen-housegasemissions,throughtheassistanceprovidedtothegovernmentinimplementingenvironmentalregulationsandpromotinggreenfinancing(Muganyietal.,2021,Wuetal.,2022).SustainabilityinfinancealsoreferstofinancialproductsandservicesthatfactorESGinduringtheloandecision,monitoring,andriskmanagementprocesses,encouragingenvironmentallyresponsibleinvestmentandpromotinglow-carbontechnologies,projects,industries,andbusinesses(KemfertandSchmalz,2019).Asamatteroffact,newstudieshavefurtherelaboratedtheroleofFinTechinthesustainabletransitionoftheeconomy.BlakstadandAllen(2018)empiricallysupportedtheenablingroleofFinTechintheachievementofSDGs.Movingpasttheenvironmentalimpactthatismostfrequentlyinvestigated,Afzaletal.,2022provideproofofthesocialinclusionandprogressthatnewtechnologiescangarner.Additionally,apositiverelationshipfromthelatteraspecthasbeenfoundalsoindevelopingmarkets,suchasGhana,wherethegrowthoftheFinTechmarketislinkedtoanincreaseinfinancialandsocialinclusioninthecountry(CoffieandHongjiang,2023).ExamplesofareasinwhichFintechcanplayasignificantrole,accordingtoPizzietal.(2021),include:(1)foodtrustandsupplychaintraceability;(2)reputationsystemstobuildtrust;(3)fractionalownershipofassets;(4)improvedidentityapplicationsthroughtraceabilityofuse/ownership;(5)disasterpredictionandmanagement;(6)traceabilityofinvestmentandtrackingofdevelopmentfunds.Asestablishedbanksarenolongertheonlyplayersinthefinancialservicesindustry,FinTechfirmscreatenewcompetitionandproductoffer,benefitingboththeeconomyandsocietyasawhole(Zetzscheetal.,2020).Thisassumesparticularrelevanceineconomiesthatareheavilyreliantonsmall-andmedium-sizedSMEs,asegmentofthebusinessuniversethatwasseverelyrestrictedintermsofaccesstocapitalafterthe2008financialcrisis.Inthisdirection,Abbasietal.,(2021)demonstratehowFinTechsimproveSMEsefficiencythroughawiderrangeoffinancingoptions,aswellasincreasethepropensityofSMEstoadopttechanddigitalsolutionsacrosstheirbusiness.1.2ThecharacteristicsofFinTechfirmsThestronggrowththeFinTechfieldhasregisteredduringthepastdecadehasbeenprimarilyfueledbythesharingeconomy,favourableregulation,ICTinnovationandtheadventofIndustry4.0(Huynhetal.,2020).TheinnovativetechnologiesofthefirmsthatareidentifiedintheFinTechmarketarefoundtospurcostofcapitalreductionsandboostoperationalefficiencythroughscaleandspeed,whilemaintainacustomer-centricbusinessmodel(Campanellaetal.,2023).Moreover,FinTechfirmsfacelowerclientacquisitioncostsandawideandgrowingcustomerbase,duetocurrentdemographictrendsandtherespectiveconsumerpreferences(LeeandShin,2018).Whilecapitalandbrandadvantages,aswellaslowerlendingcosts,favourtraditionalbanks,duetotheirreputationcapital,theirrelativetransparencyandtheeconomiesofscalethatcomewithlaterstagesinanindustry’slifecycle,FinTechfirmscannowprovemoreagileintherecognitionandThispreprintresearchpaperhasnotbeenpeerreviewed.Electroniccopyavailableat:https://ssrn.com/abstract=4488108Preprintnotpeerreviewed5managementofrisks(ValverdeandFernández,2020).Inthenewaugmentedregulatoryenvironment,withthefirstESG-relateddirectivesinEuropeandasimilarevolutionanticipatedbrieflyintheUSA,previousresearchhasraisedconcernsregardingtheimpactofaggressiveclimatepoliciesonlong-standinginstitutions(Leeetal.,2022).FinTechfirms,unliketraditionalbanks,cancapitalizeonbigdata,advanceddataanalytics,blockchainandartificialintelligencetoleveragetheirinvestmentstrategiesandsustainabilityprofile.Inacontextofreducedstandardizationandlackofobjective,unbiaseddataontheESGaspectsofinvestments,FinTechfirmscanleverageontheirtechnologicaladvantagesandbecomeearlymoversintheESGarena,achievingcompetitiveadvantagesinimprovedvaluationandriskmanagement(AgliardiandAgliardi,2019;DorfleitnerandBraun,2019).Blockchaintechnologyensuresthevalidityandtraceabilityofproducts,hedginginformationasymmetries(Linetal.,2021),whiletracingcarbontradingmarkets(RichardsonandXu,2020).OneofthekeyfeaturesofFinTechplayersinthefinancialservicesindustryistheirconsumer-centricbusinessmodels,focusedonconsumerempowermentthrougheasierandlesscostlyaccesstoinformation,productsandservices(Merelloetal.,2022).AccordingtoDeloitte’sreport(2022),millennials(peoplebornbetween1981and1996)andGenerationZ(peoplebornbetween1997and2012),whorepresentthenewgenerationsofconsumersandinvestors,demonstrateunprecedentedfocusandprioritizationtothesocialandenvironmentalimpactoftheirconsumption,careerandinvestingdecisions.Thelatterrepresentsadimensionthatwillnaturallyinfluencethemarketsandcompetitivestrategiesofallindustries.Sharmaetal.(2020),infact,pointoutthatfinancialservicesprovidersshouldpaymoreattentionattheirreputationandimage,withtheultimategoalofenhancingconsumertrustlevels,anaspectthatbecomesevenmorecrucialinanewandfairlyopaqueindustrysofarsuchasFinTech.Inasimilarmanner,Alnawayseh(2020)sustainsthatinthepost-pandemicerathedigitaltransitionofconsumersforfinancialserviceswillbemuchmorelikelyifFinTechfirmsmanagetoconveysocialvalue,trustandlowriskperception.TheissueoftrustwasalsotreatedbySenyoandOsabutey(2020),whomakethecaseforareviewofpoliciesandregulationsasasthemediatorfortrustindigitalandtechnologicalservices.1.3ESGinFinTechfirmsWiththedevelopmentoftheFinTechindustry,thenewplayersareloweringinformationasymmetriesandincreasecostcompetition,whiledemonstratingpotentialtopromotesustainableeconomicgrowth.Nevertheless,aquestionarisesastotheextentofthesustainabilityofthefirmsthatareactuallyinvolvedinthefieldandtowhatextentsustainabilitycancreatevaluefortheirinvestorsandcustomers.Sustainabilityinfinancialfirmsassumesadifferentdimensioncomparedtoothersectors.Inparticular,thesustainabilityperformanceoffinancialservicesprovidersrevolvesaroundtheintegrationofESGconsiderationsintheiroperations,intermsofcapitalallocationdecisionprocessesandriskmanagement,andthedeliveryofproductsandservicesofanenvironmentaland/orsocialnature(Sanninoetal.,2020;NguyenandNguyen,2020).Corporatesocialresponsibility,oftenerroneouslyusedinaninterchangeablemannerwithESG,anditsrelationshipwithfinancialperformanceandshareholdersvaluehaslongbeenstudied(Orlitzkyetal.,2003;Linsetal.,2017,Lietal.,2019,Broadstocketal.,2020,Harjotoetal.,2021).Studiesthatmakethecaseofapositiverelationshiptendtolinkhighercorporateresponsibilitytoamultitudeofvalue-creatingfactors,suchasimprovedemployeesatisfactionandretention,talentattraction,customerloyalty,trustcapitalandresilience,brandequityandlowercostsoffinancing.However,severalresearchersreflectonanegativeornullrelationshipbetweenCSRandfinancialperformance(Gaoetal.,2021),whileseveralotherspointtoThispreprintresearchpaperhasnotbeenpeerreviewed.Electroniccopyavailableat:https://ssrn.com/abstract=4488108Preprintnotpeerreviewed6thespacethattheformerleavestoopportunisticbehaviorsandagencyissues(Ohetal.,2019,Chenetal.,2021;LuandWang,2021).WhileCSRstudyinindustrialfirmsisburgeoning,theeffectofCSRinfinancialinstitutionsremainsunderexplored.The2008financialcollapse,aswellasalongseriesofscandals,erodedinvestortrustandconfidence,givingrisetoanincreasedawarenessofresponsibilityinthefinancialsector,nowheldaccountablebyawiderrangeofstakeholders.Aseriesofresearchers(WuandShein,2013;Mallinetal.,2014;Azmietal.,2021)findthathigherinvestmentinresponsiblepracticesleadstocheaperfinancingand,thus,highervaluationsfortraditionalbanks.SimilarfindingsarepresentedbystudiesthatinvestigatetheimpactofESGdisclosureonbanks’financialperformance,ratherthaninvestmentsinCSR,suggestingthatinvestorsexpectfinancialinstitutionstorespondtoenvironmentalandsocialconcernsinordertograntaccesstocapital(Jizietal.,2014;LeeandMaxfield,2015).Fromwhathasbeendiscussedsofar,itemergesthatwhiletraditionaleconomicsectors,includingthebankingindustry,havebeenexplored,theonlyrerearch,toourknowledge,thatdelvesintotheimpactofsustainabilitydisclosureinFinTechwasconductedbyMerelloetal.(2022)onlistedUSFinTechfirms.ThelatterleavesasignificantgapinliteraturethathasnoevidencecomingfromEUfirms,presentlytheonlyonessubjecttoaformalregulationregardingESGdisclosure.Basedontheabovearguments,weproposethefollowinghypothesis:H1ThereisapositiveassociationbetweenESGdisclosureandfundinglevelsforFinTechs.H2ThereisapositiveassociationbetweenthelevelofsustainabilitycertificationandfundinglevelsforFinTechs.2.Method2.1SampleWedrawoursamplefromthebiggestFinTechcompaniesintheEuropeanUnion,basedonthelatestvaluationsonrealizedtransactions.WemanuallycollectdataonFinTechoperationsfromPitchBook,informativeofVC-backedoperations,FinancialTechnology(FT)Partners,whichregularlyreportsdataonfinancialoperationsandinsightsimpactingtheFinTechlandscape,andCrunchBase,databasefocusedonFinTech.Proceeding,wemergeourinitiallycollecteddatawithfinancialandmarketdatafromZephyrBureauvanDijkandStatista.WepurposedlyselectbiggerplayersintheFinTechfield,providedtheESGdiscoursehasbeenfoundtobenegativelyrelatedtothefirm’ssize(JohnsonandGreening,1999)andalsogivenourneedforreputationandESGperformancedata.Inaddition,weavoidtheheavyimpactofeventualmarketabilityandilliquiditydiscountssmallerenterprisesarevulnerableto.Withtheobjectivetoconductalongitudinalanalysisandguaranteearobustpanelforoureconometricmodel,weexaminetheperiodfromJanuary2014toDecember2022.OurinitialsampleofoperationsconcludedwithaFinTechtargetfirmwascomposedofatotalof429dealsincountriesoftheEuropeanUnion.Proceeding,weexcludeoperationsinvolvingfirmsthatlackdataonESGperformanceandreporting,aswellasoperationsthatinvolvedthelistingoftheFinTechfirm.Companies’diversityismanifestedbytheirage,astheyweresetupafteranaverageof9years,withaminimumof3andamaximumof17years.Furthermore,asmentionedintheintroductionofthisstudy,diversityisThispreprintresearchpaperhasnotbeenpeerreviewed.Electroniccopyavailableat:https://ssrn.com/abstract=4488108Preprintnotpeerreviewed7manifestedbythefieldofoperations(moneytransferandpayments,savingsandinvestments,digitallendingandlendingmarketplaces,onlineinsuranceandinsurancemarketplaces,andotherservicepropositions),whichiscontrolledforinafinalsamplethatwasnotsegregated.Ourfinalsamplecomprises376operationsovertheperiod2016-2022.Table1presentsoursamplebreakdownintermsofyearofvaluationandfieldfortheFinTechfirminvolved.Table1SamplebreakdownbyyearandFinTechservicesYearPaymentsInsuranceDepositsandlendingInvestmentservicesMarketprovisioningCapitalRaising20142043062015202104201660870320179361605201812112182122019141915372020124101229202113814105820222571215413952477971667Total376Source:Authors’elaborationbasedonclassificationschemebyRupeika-ApogaandThalassinos,20202.2VariablesWeinvestigatetheimpactofthesustainabilityprofileintheFinTechfieldonthelevelsoffundingthefirmscanachieveintheEUmarketduringtheperiod2014-2022.Ourdependentvariable,whichisthefundingobtained(FUND),ismeasuredasthenaturallogarithmofmoneyraisedduringtheroundoffundingstudied.OurmodelisbasedonthefollowingvariablesthatmeasuresustainablebehaviourforFinTechfirmsinoursample:(1)ESG_Rep:adummyvariablethatassumesavalueof1ifthecompanydisclosesaSustainabilityReportinyeart,and0otherwise;(2)GRI_Rep:adummyvariablethatassumesavalueof1ifthecompanyfollowsGRIguidelinesinyeart,and0otherwise,providedtheyrepresentthemostwidelyacceptedframeworkforESGdisclosure,collaboratingwiththeEUonitsnewregulatoryrequirements;(3)Green:adummyvariablethatassumesavalueof1ifthefirmisincludedinyeartintheGreenRanking,and0ifitisnot;(4)RepTrak:adummyvariablethatassumesavalueof1ifthefirmisincludedinyeartintheCSRRepTrakRankingand0otherwise;(5)Cert:NumberofGreencertificatesoftheCompanyinyeart.Weconsiderthefollowingcertificates:LEED,BREEAM,CarbonNeutral,EPAEnergyStar,NABERS,CarbonDisclosureProject,RE100,SASBandISO14001,inlinewithMerelloetal.(2022).Thispreprintresearchpaperhasnotbeenpeerreviewed.Electroniccopyavailableat:https://ssrn.com/abstract=4488108Preprintnotpeerreviewed8Wefurtherintegrateouranalysiswiththenecessarycontrolsforfinancialandeconomicaspectsofperformanceinoursample:(6)firmsize(SIZE),measuredbythenaturallogarithmoftotalassets,followingstudieslikeCòrdovaetal.,(2018),OkandKim(2019)amongstothers,inordertoguaranteecomparabilityandreduceheteroscedasticityproblems;(7)profitability(ROA),measuredastheReturnonAssets;(8)financialleverage(LEV),measuredastheratiooftotalfinancialdebtovershareholders’equity;(9)Age(AGE),measuredasthenumberofyearsbetweenincorporationandtheyearofthefundingroundexamined;(10)growth(GROWTH),measuredastheyear-on-yeargrowthrateofrevenue.Finally,weaddcontrolvariablessuggestedinliteratureasfactorsinfluencingfinancingtechandyoungenterprises:(11)PreviousInstitutionalOwnership(BACK),adummyvariablethatassumesthevalue1ifthereispreviousVentureCapital(VC)orPrivateEquity(PE)presenceintheshareholderbase,inlinewithHidayatetal.(2022)thatsupportthenotioninstitutionalbackingpositivelyaffectsvaluation,especiallyintechandyoungenterprises,functioningasacertifier;(12)previouspublicsectorshareholdingandsubsidies(PUB),inlinewithGbadegeshinetal.(2022)thatindicatepublicsubsidiesand/orshareholdingfunctionasacertifierforhighlytechnologicalventures;(13)MarketforFinTech(MOMENTUM),thatmeasuresFinTechmomentuminthemarketofreference,intermsoflevelsofoverallfundingreceivedinthesameyearbyFinTechcompaniesinthesamecountry(naturallogarithmofcapitalinvested).Table2presentsthekeydescriptivestatisticsforthevariablesthatcomposeourmodel.Table2DescriptivestatisticsofmodelvariablesVariablesMeanS.D.MinMaxFUND17.729.2116.3320.33ESG_REP0.360.510.001.00GRI_REP0.160.370.001.00GREEN0.010.130.001.00REP_TRAK0.010.040.001.00CERT0.191.560.009.00SIZE8.333.911.1015.22ROA-0.316.47-145.21301.66LEV2.189.99-120.06188.74AGE5.433.67318GROWTH0.410.2330.092.78BACK0.610.000.001.00PUB0.170.230.001.00MOMENTUM16.318.2112.8821.00Source:Authors'elaborationThispreprintresearchpaperhasnotbeenpeerreviewed.Electroniccopyavailableat:https://ssrn.com/abstract=4488108Preprintnotpeerreviewed9AscanbeseenfromdatareportedinTable2,onlya36%ofFinTechfirmsinthesampleoptforanESGreport,percentagethatdropsto16%whenitcomestofirmsthatdosoadoptingtheGRIdisclosureguidelines.Atthesametime,only1%ofthesample’sFinTechfirmsareincludedinGreenandRepTrakrankings,withthepercentagereaching19%forfirmsthatholdagreencertificate.Movingaheadtoexaminethesignalingmechanismsthatregardpreviousinvestorsinthefirm,61%offirmshadpreviouslyreceivedfundingbyinstitutionalinvestorsand17%offirmshadreceivedfundingfromthestate,eitherintheformofsubsidiesorequityinvestments.Finally,wecanobservealackofhomogeneitywhenitcomestothefinancialcharacteristicsofthefirmsinthisstudy.Financialleverage,profitability,growthratesandsizediffergreatlyamongobservations.Following,Table3reportsresultsonthenon-parametricWilcoxonrank-sumtestweperformforourdependentvariablethatfollowsanon-normaldistribution,whichweverifyboththroughahistogramandapplyingtheShapiro-WilkWtest.Table3Wilcoxonrank-sum(Mann-Whitney)test.,Forthe10%andthe1%significancelevel,respectivelyFUNDESG_REPGRI_REPGREENREP_TRAKCERTSIZEROALEVAGEGROWTHBACKPUBMOMENTUMFUND-ESG_REP0,64152-GRI_REP0,885060,41481-GREEN0,806850,214830,64449-REP_TRAK0,235620,097020,210870,2376-CERT-0,109-0,043-0,091-0,1110,05742-Thispreprintresearchpaperhasnotbeenpeerreviewed.Electroniccopyavailableat:https://ssrn.com/abstract=4488108Preprintnotpeerreviewed10SIZE0,650430,305910,648450,55640,22374-0,07029-ROA0,216810,054450,209880,22970,11088-0,078210,2891-LEV0,294030,067320,289080,31280,16731-0,033660,28610,393-AGE0,000990,00990,00990,00010,085140,024750,0683-0,0340,0495-GROWTH0,057420,063360,03960,0376-0,099-0,136620,05350,340560,17820,0426-BACK0,053460,032670,081180,0109-0,07128-0,112860,13860,35940,14450,03660,2188-PUB0,063360,071280,044550,0396-0,06435-0,17820,06930,23760,15840,01580,21090,1049-MOMENTUM0,139590,096030,120780,1129-0,10791-0,105930,07720,21680,14260,11880,21680,15840,1673-Source:Authors'elaboration2.3ModelSpecificationGiventhenon-observableheterogeneityinsustainabilityadoption,cross-sectionalandtemporalseriesanalyseswererejectedforthepurposesofthisstudy.Furthermore,sustainabilitydatapresentendogeneityproblems,whichwasconfirmedforoursamplebytheHausmantest,corroboratedbyaRamseytest.Asaresultoftheaforementionedconsiderationsregardingourdata,weapplyadynamicandstaticpanelanalysis,guaranteeingmoredegreesoffreedomandtreatingvariabilityinthesample.FollowingMerelloetal.(2022),weapplyaGMMestimationofequationsbycontrollingforendogeneityemployingthedifferencesandlevelsofendogenousvariablesasinstrumentsandlaggingourdependentvariableasanexplanatoryvariable.WeperformtheSarganTesttoanalysethevalidityoftheinstrumentsusedtoconfirmwhethertheover-identificationrestrictionsarevalidinallcases.Thispreprintresearchpaperhasnotbeenpeerreviewed.Electroniccopyavailableat:https://ssrn.com/abstract=4488108Preprintnotpeerreviewed11Following,weemploytheArellano-Bondtesttocheckforfirst-andsecond-orderautocorrelations,assumingthat,atthispoint,endogeneityhasbeeneffectivelytreated.Inourstudy,thedependentvariablemeasuresthecapitalraisedduringtheroundoffunding,whileindependentvariablesremainaspreviouslydiscussed,withtheadditionofthelaggeddependentvariable.OurGMMisshapedasfollows(Merelloetal.,2022):Yit=β0+β1Yit−1+β2ESGRepit+β3GRIRepit+β4Greenit+β5RepTrakit+β6Certit+β7Sizeit+β9ROAit+β10Levit+β11Ageit+β12Growthit+β13Backit+β14Pubit+β15Momentumit+YEAR2014−2022+εitwhereYitisthedependentvariableforcompanyiinyeart,Yit−1isthefirstlagofthedependentvariable,andεit=μi+θitistherandomerrortermforcompanyiattimet,andiscomposedoftwoorthogonalcomponents:μi(thecombinedeffectvariesamongcompaniesandperiodsoftime)andθit(individualeffect,whichisidiosyncraticofthecompany).TheinclusionofyeardummyvariablespreventsmoredelaysbeingincludedintheGMMSystemandavoidsover-identificationproblems.WecorrectedautocorrelationandheteroscedasticityproblemswitharobustestimationofregressionsusingthePanelCorrectedStandardErrors(PCSE)Statictechnique(BeckandKatz,1995).ItisnoteworthythatasnoneoftheresultingVIFsexceededthecriticalvalueof10,multicollinearitywasnotconsideredtoposeaseriousproblem.Finally,totreatoutliersdetectedamongourobservations,were-runourregressionafterwinsorizingallmodelvariablesinbothtailsof1%.Findingsdonotsignificantlyalter,leadingustomaintainallobservationsaftertheunreportedcontrol.3.FindingsanddiscussionTable4belowreportsourempiricalfindingsregardingtheimpactofsustainabilityonfundinglevelsreceivedbyFinTechfirmsintheEUduringtheperiod2014-2022.Table4EmpiricalresultsoftheGMMregressionLag11.249.98ESG_REP1,009.310.94GRI_REP12,000.221.19Thispreprintresearchpaperhasnotbeenpeerreviewed.Electroniccopyavailableat:https://ssrn.com/abstract=4488108Preprintnotpeerreviewed12GREEN32,121.772.09REP_TRAK41,213.370.76CERT2,311.560.62SIZE14,993.911.99ROA18,880.484.22LEV-5,123.25-7.01AGE12,333.783.56GROWTH21,771.332.99BACK1,234.662.17PUB1,790.744.18MOMENTUM17,883.045.33YearcontrolsyesObservations376R20.7412Wald(chi2)100.98Source:Authors’elaboration,,Forthe10%,5%and1%significancelevelrespectively.AsdepictedinTable4,ourGMMonfundinglevelsisfreeofendogeneity,over-identificationandautocorrelationofresiduals(Arellano-Bondtest).Inourestimatedregressionsinstrumentsarefewerthanthenumberofcompanies,whilethefirstlagofFundingispositivelysignificant.Thelatterconfirmstherewerefewerinstrumentsthanthenumberofcompanies.Thelatterconfirmsthatpreviousfundingisdirectlyrelatedtothecapitalraisedduringthefollowinground.Shiftingourattentiontothekeyfocusofthisresearch,sustainabilityvariablespresentdifferentpatternsofsignificance.Morespecifically,asustainabilityreport,boththemerepresenceofareportandtheadoptionofGRIstandardsofreporting,(ESG_Rep&GRI_Rep),stronglyandpositivelyaffectsaccessThispreprintresearchpaperhasnotbeenpeerreviewed.Electroniccopyavailableat:https://ssrn.com/abstract=4488108Preprintnotpeerreviewed13tocapital.InlinewithKrishnamurtiaandVelayuthamn(2017),Còrdovaetal.(2018),andMerelloetal.(2022),firmsthatreportontheirESGperformancefosterapositiveperceptionamonginvestorsthatfactortransparencyandreducedasymmetriesin.Contrarytothisfirstfinding,certificatesandtheinclusioninRep_Trakrankingsdonotseemtoinfluencethelevelsoffundingreceivedbythefirm.ExceptiontothelatteristheinclusionoftheFinTechfirmintheGreenrankingthatpresentsapositiveimpactonourdependentvariable,afactthatcouldbeattributedtotheincreasedvisibilityandwidespreadperceptionthatisgarneredbythefirmratherthanitsactualtestunderenvironmentalrisks,goingbacktotheconceptofsignalingdynamicsthataffectinvestorsandtheasymmetricnatureofthestillyoungFinTechfield.Asexpected,atthispointinourstudy,financialcharacteristicsoftheFinTechfirmallresulthighlysignificantfortheirfinancing.Morespecifically,profitability,growth,ageandsizedrivefundinglevelsupinFinTechfirms.Financialleverage,ontheotherhand,hasanegativeimpactonfunding.Assuggestedinpreviousliterature,moreprofitableandpromisingbutlessindebtedfirmsaccesshigherlevelsoffinancing(Fengetal.,2018;OkandKim,2019).Passingtotheownershipandmarketvariables,wefindasignificantpositiverelationshipbetweenfundingreceivedandpreviousinstitutional(VCand/orPE)shareholding,aswellasthelevelsoffundinginvestedintheFinTechfieldasawholeinthecountryandyearofreference.Finally,previoussubsidiesorequityinvestmentsbythestatedonotappeartoinfluencefundinglevelsamongourobservations.Findingscomeinlinewithpreviousstudiesthatprimarilyfocusontechcompaniesandstartups,bothcategoriesclosetotheFinTech.Inparticular,Hidayatetal.(2022)suggestthatpreviousVCandPEshareholdingintechstartupsfunctionsasacertifierofthequalityoftheinnovationandtheyoungenterprise’sproductsandservicesforthefundingroundsthatfollow.Inasimilarmanner,theoveralltrendinthemarketofreferencestronglyaffectsfundingthatindividualcompanieseventuallyreceive(Strielkowskietal.,2022).4.ConclusionsThe4.0IndustrialRevolutionhasgivenbirthtoanewcategoryofplayersinthelong-standingandlow-innovationsectoroffinancialservices.Technologicalinnovationinthefinancefield,denominatedFinTech,hasreshapedthesectorthroughawiderangeofnewbusinessmodels,distributionnetworks,re-engineeredtraditionalproducts,aswellasnewproductsandservices.Operationalefficiency,customer-centricstrategies,facilitatedaccesstobothinformationaboutandfinancialservicesdefineafieldthatpresentsboominggrowthratesandgreatpotentialtoassumealeadingrolebothinitssectorbutalsointhetransitionoftheeconomyasawholetowardsthesustainableparadigmsustainedbyregulationandglobaltrends.Oneofthekeycharacteristicsoftheindustry,asdiscussedindetailthroughoutthispaper,liesinitsdiversityintermsofthematurityandmarketprofilesofitsparticipants.ThisstudydiscussestheroletheFinTechfieldcanplayinthesustainabletransitionexploringforthefirsttimetheimpactthatsaidsustainabilitygeneratesonFinTechfirms.Toourbestknowledge,thisisthefirststudythatinvestigatestherelationshipbetweenESGdisclosureandfundinginthisbloomingindustry,afocusofparticularsignificanceatthisparticulartiming.Infact,analyzingFinTechfundingroundsandESGfactorsintheEUcontextduringaperiodwhenthefirstgloballyregulationregardingsustainablefinanceanddisclosureforfinancialmarketparticipantshasbeenreleasedoffersamultitudeofimportantinsightsforvariousstakeholders,fromregulatorstoinvestorsandFinTechmanagers.OurThispreprintresearchpaperhasnotbeenpeerreviewed.Electroniccopyavailableat:https://ssrn.com/abstract=4488108Preprintnotpeerreviewed14studyhighlightsapositiverelationshipbetweenESGdisclosureandcapitalflowsintoFinTechs,whilecontradictoryareourfindingsregardingspecificindicatorsoffirmsustainability.WediscoverthatFinTechfirms,despitetherelativelyyoungageofthemarket,arestillprevalentlyvaluedontheirfinancialandmarketcharacteristics.Similartostartupsandtechfirms,riskperceptionisratherhighamonginvestorsand,assuch,benefitsfromcertifiers.Inourstudy,apositivesignalofqualitythatseemstoimproveriskandvalueperceptioncomesfrompreviousinstitutionalownership,afactorforinstancethathasnotbeenfoundtobeofsignificancefortraditionalbankinginstitutionsthatenjoyamatureprofileandhightrustcapitalwithinvestorsandcustomers.WhatisofparticularinterestisthatsustainabilityinformationappearstoberelevantforinvestorswhenitcomestoFinTechfirms.Thelattercanbejustifiedbytheexpectationsandcentralrolethatfinancehasbeenassignedduringtheongoingtransitiontowardsasustainableparadigmfortheeconomy,whichleadsustopondertwomechanismsthroughwhichsuchrelationshipischanneled:(1)investorsarefactoringinregulatory,thustransitionrisks,intotheircapitalallocationdecisions,expectingthatFinTechfirms,similartotraditionalbanks,willbeliablefortheESGrisksintheirservicesandproducts;(2)apartfromriskconsiderationsaffectinginvestmentdecisions,valueconsiderationsmaybeofsignificanceintherelationshipwefindsupportfor.Withrespecttothelatter,itisnotunlikelythatabigpartofmorefavourableinvestorperceptionsregardingmoresustainablefirmscomesfromtheopportunitiesthatESGhasbroughtupon;newergenerationcustomers,whoarevitalforFinTechproviders,arehighlysusceptibletotheimpactoftheirconsumptiondecisionsandoveralllifestyle,atrendthatpromisesslidgrowthpotential.Furthermore,therelevancethatESGdisclosureassumesforFinTechinvestorsmaybeattributabletothelowtrustthatstillcharacterizesthemarket.Moredetailedinformation,especiallyregardingkeyriskandvaluedriversthatarenotefficientlyornotatallreportedinclassicfinancialreportingdocuments,reducesinformationasymmetries,increasestransparencyandmayworkasanindicatorofgoodmanagementandgoodfaithonbehalfofFinTechfirms.Thisiscorroboratedbythesignificanceofanysustainabilitydisclosureinourfindings,higherforthestringentandgloballyacceptedGRIstandards.Atthesametime,itisnottobeomittedthatfinershadesofESGperformancearestilllittlecredibleoroflimitedimportanceforinvestors,ifwegobacktothenullrelationshipbetweenrankingandcertificationandthelevelsoffundingachieved.TheexceptionofGreenRanking,whichappearssignificant,maybeexplainedbytheimminenceofenvironmentalconsiderationsinregulatoryagendaandconsumerpreferences.Weshould,atthispoint,rememberthattheEUwasselectedasourmarketfocusbecauseitisthefirstblocktointroduceregulationonESGdisclosureandsustainablefinance.EvenintheEU,however,theenvironmentalaspectofrisksremainstheonlyoneofficiallytreatedwithmetricsandstandardsgiventothemarket’sparticipants(EUTaxonomy).Infact,oneofthekeyissuesinthefieldofESGremainsthelackofunbiasedandquantifiablemetricsforsocialperformance,althoughtheEUisexpectedtoreleaseaSocialTaxonomyaswell.FinTechcompaniesthataremoretransparent,larger,lessindebted,withrobustgrowth,moremature,moreprofitableandenjoyinstitutionalandanactivemarketbackingcanbenefitfromincreasedESGdisclosure.Nevertheless,thecurrentmomentuminthismarketshoulddrawmajorattentionfrompolicymakersandinvestors.IncentivizingtransparencyandactivelyengagingtheFinTechmarketinadiscourseandstrategyplanningthatintegratesESGcangenerateamyriadofpositiveeffects.Investorsandconsumerswillbuildtrust,FinTechfirmswillfacebetterfinancingconditions,whileonacountryandsupranationallevel,thesustainabletransitionwillbefacilitatedandacceleratedthroughanewactivesourceoffunding,aswellastheefficiencyandhelpoftechnologytotacklefundamentalproblemsnowpresent.Asamatteroffact,FinTechhasanadvantagethattraditionalfinancelacksandThispreprintresearchpaperhasnotbeenpeerreviewed.Electroniccopyavailableat:https://ssrn.com/abstract=4488108Preprintnotpeerreviewed15thatisitcanbepartofthefinancingprovider,aswellaseffectivelydealwithbettermonitoring,interpretingESGdatathatlackstandardizationandobjectivityintheirsources.Concluding,variousnewdirectionscanbetakenforfutureresearchinthefield.GiventhevariednatureofservicesthatFinTechfirmsprovide,acategorizationandlaterinvestigationofESGdynamicsbasedonthespecificcharacteristicsofeachsub-marketwouldgeneratevaluableinsightstoriskmechanisms.Forinstance,blockchainandcryptocurrencieshaveacompletelydifferentprofileregardingtheirenvironmentalimpactduringtheservice/productproductionphasealready.Furthermore,acomparativeanalysiscouldfocusonFinTechincountrieswhereregulationonESGand/orontheirmarketisstillinexistentorlackingversusFinTechincountriesthatpresenthighersophisticationandcentralintervention.Finally,elaboratingthespecifictypesofinvestorsandcustomersthatFinTechcompaniesfacecouldbetestedinrelationtotheircommitmenttoESGandparticularpoliciesadoptedThispreprintresearchpaperhasnotbeenpeerreviewed.Electroniccopyavailableat:https://ssrn.com/abstract=4488108Preprintnotpeerreviewed16ReferencesAbbasi,K.,Alam,A.,Du,M.A.andHuynh,T.L.D.(2021).FinTech,SMEefficiencyandnationalculture:evidencefromOECDcountries.TechnologicalForecastingandSocialChange,163,120454.10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120454Afzal,A.,Firdousi,S.F.,Waqar,A.andAwais,M.(2022).Theinfluenceofinternetpenetrationonpovertyandincomeinequality.SageOpen,12(3),Article21582440221116104,10.1177/21582440221116104Agliardi,E.andAgliardi,R.(2019).Financingenvironmentally-sustainableprojectswithgreenbonds.Environmentanddevelopmenteconomics,24(6),608-623.10.1017/S1355770X19000020Alawi,S.M.,Karim,S.,Meero,A.A.,Rabbani,M.R.,andNaeem,M.A.(2022).Informationtransmissioninregionalenergystockmarkets.EnvironmentalScienceandPollutionResearch.1–13.Alnawayseh,M.K.(2020).FinTechinCOVID-19andbeyond:whatfactorsareaffectingcustomers’choiceofFinTechapplications?JournalofOpenInnovation:Technology,Market,andComplexity,6,153.https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6040153.Arner,D.W.,Barberis,J.andBuckley,R.P.(2015).TheevolutionofFintech:Anewpost-crisisparadigm.GeorgetownJournalofInternationalLaw,47,1271.Azmi,W.,Hassan,M.K.,Houston,R.andKarim,M.S.(2021).ESGactivitiesandbankingperformance:Internationalevidencefromemergingeconomies.JournalofInternationalFinancialMarkets,InstitutionsandMoney,70,101277.Baldassarre,B.,Keskin,D.,Diehl,J.C.,Bocken,N.andCalabretta,G.(2020).Implementingsustainabledesigntheoryinbusinesspractice:Acalltoaction.JournalofCleanerProduction,273,Article123113,10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123113Beck,N.andKatz,J.N.(1995).Whattodo(andnottodo)withtimes-series–cross-sectiondataincomparativepolitics.AmericanPoliticalScienceReview,89(3),634–647.https://doi.org/10.2307/2082979.Becker,M.G.,Martin,F.,andWalter,A.(2022).ThepowerofESGtransparency:TheeffectofthenewSFDRsustainabilitylabelsonmutualfundsandindividualinvestors.FinanceResearchLetters,47(B),102708,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.102708.Blakstad,S.andAllen,R.(2018).FinTechrevolution.Cham,Switzerland:Springer,121,132.Broadstock,D.C.,Matousek,R.,Meyer,M.andTzeremes,N.G.(2020).Doescorporatesocialresponsibilityimpactfirms'innovationcapacity?Theindirectlinkbetweenenvironmental&socialgovernanceimplementationandinnovationperformance.JournalofBusinessResearch,119,99-110.Campanella,F.,Serino,L.,Battisti,E.,Giakoumelou,A.,andKarasamani,I.(2023).FinTechinthefinancialsystem:Towardsacapital-intensiveandhighcompetencehumancapitalreality?,JournalofBusinessResearch.155(A),113376.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113376.Chen,S.,Chen,Y.andJebran,K.(2021).Trustandcorporatesocialresponsibility:Fromexpectedutilityandsocialnormativeperspective.JournalofBusinessResearch,134,518-530.DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.05.045Thispreprintresearchpaperhasnotbeenpeerreviewed.Electroniccopyavailableat:https://ssrn.com/abstract=4488108Preprintnotpeerreviewed17Coffie,C.P.K.andHongjiang,Z.(2023).FinTechmarketdevelopmentandfinancialinclusioninGhana:Theroleofheterogeneousactors,TechnologicalForecastingandSocialChange,186(A),122127.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122127.Còrdova,C.,Zorio-Grima,A.andMerello,P.(2018).CarbonEmissionsbySouthAmericanCompanies:DrivingFactorsforReportingDecisionsandEmissionsReduction.Sustainability,10,2411.https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072411.Croutzet,A.andDabbous,A.(2021).DoFinTechtriggerrenewableenergyuse?EvidencefromOECDcountries,RenewableEnergy,179,1608-1617,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.07.144.DeloitteGlobal(2022).GenZandMillennialSurvey.Dorfleitner,G.andBraun,D.(2019).Fintech,digitalizationandblockchain:possibleapplicationsforgreenfinance.TheriseofgreenfinanceinEurope:opportunitiesandchallengesforissuers,investorsandmarketplaces,207-237.10.1007/978-3-030-22510-0_9Feng,Z.Y.,Chen,C.R.andTseng,Y.J.(2018).Docapitalmarketsvaluecorporatesocialresponsibility?Evidencefromseasonedequityofferings.JournalofBankingandFinance,94,54–74.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2018.06.015.Fernando,Y.,Jabbour,C.J.C.andWah,W.X.(2019).Pursuinggreengrowthintechnologyfirmsthroughtheconnectionsbetweenenvironmentalinnovationandsustainablebusinessperformance:doesservicecapabilitymatter?.Resources,ConservationandRecycling,141,8-20,10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.09.031Gao,F.,Li,Y.,Wang,X.andZhong,Z.K.(2021).CorporatesocialresponsibilityandthetermstructureofCDSspreads.JournalofInternationalFinancialMarkets,InstitutionsandMoney,74,101406.Gbadegeshin,S.A.,AlNatsheh,A.,Ghafel,K.,Mohammed,O.,Koskela,A.,Rimpiläinen,A.,Tikkanen,J.andKuoppala,A.(2022).OvercomingtheValleyofDeath:ANewModelforHighTechnologyStartups.SustainableFutures,4,100077.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2022.100077.Harjoto,M.A.,Hoepner,A.G.andLi,Q.(2021).Corporatesocialirresponsibilityandportfolioperformance:Across-nationalstudy.JournalofInternationalFinancialMarkets,InstitutionsandMoney,70,101274.Hidayat,S.E.,Bamahriz,O.,Hidayati,N.,Sari,C.A.andDewandaru,G.(2022).Valuedriversofstartupvaluationfromventurecapitalequity-basedinvesting:Aglobalanalysiswithafocusontechnologicalfactors.BorsaIstanbulReview,22(4),653-667.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2021.10.001.Huovila,A.,Bosch,P.andAiraksinen,M.(2019).Comparativeanalysisofstandardizedindicatorsforsmartsustainablecities:Whatindicatorsandstandardstouseandwhen?.Cities,89,141-153,10.1016/j.cities.2019.01.029Huynh,T.L.D.,Hille,E.andNasir,M.A.(2020).Diversificationintheageofthe4thindustrialrevolution:theroleofartificialintelligence,greenbondsandcryptocurrencies.TechnologicalForecastingandSocialChange,159,120188,10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120188Irfan,M.,Razzaq,A.,Sharif,A.andYang,X.(2022).Influencemechanismbetweengreenfinanceandgreeninnovation:exploringregionalpolicyinterventioneffectsinChina.TechnologicalForecastingandSocialChange,182,121882.10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121882Thispreprintresearchpaperhasnotbeenpeerreviewed.Electroniccopyavailableat:https://ssrn.com/abstract=4488108Preprintnotpeerreviewed18Jizi,M.I.,Salama,A.,Dixon,R.andStratling,R.(2014).Corporategovernanceandcorporatesocialresponsibilitydisclosure:EvidencefromtheUSbankingsector.Journalofbusinessethics,125,601-615.Johnson,R.A.,andGreening,D.W.(1999).TheEffectsofCorporateGovernanceandInstitutionalOwnershipTypesonCorporateSocialPerformance.TheAcademyofManagementJournal42(5),564–76.https://doi.org/10.2307/256977.Karim,S.,Lucey,B.M.,andNaeem,M.A.(2022a).Thedarksideofbitcoin:DoemergingAsianislamicmarketssubduetheethicalrisk?.SSRNelectronicjournal,4025831.Karim,S.,Lucey,B.M.,Naeem,M.A.,andUddin,G.S.(2022b).ExaminingtheinterrelatednessofNFTs,DeFitokensandcryptocurrencies.FinanceResearchLetters,102696.Kemfert,C.andSchmalz,S.(2019).SustainableFinance:PoliticalChallengesofDevelopmentandImplementationofFrameworkConditions,GreenFinance.AIMSPress,Springfield,MO,1(3),237-248.https://doi.org/10.3934/GF.2019.3.237Krishnamurtia,C.andVelayuthamn,E.(2017).Theinfluenceofboardcommitteestructuresonvoluntarydisclosureofgreenhousegasemissions:Australianevidence.Pacific-BasinFinanceJournal,50,65–81.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2017.09.003.Lee,J.andMaxfield,S.(2015).Doingwellbyreportinggood:reportingcorporateresponsibilityandcorporateperformance.BusinessandSocietyReview,120(4),577–606.https://doi.org/10.1111/basr.12075.Lee,I.andShin,Y.J.(2018).Fintech:Ecosystem,businessmodels,investmentdecisions,andchallenges.BusinessHorizons,61(1),35-46.https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:bushor:v:61:y:2018:i:1:p:35-46.Lee,C.C.,Qin,S.andLi,Y.(2022).Doesindustrialrobotapplicationpromotegreentechnologyinnovationinthemanufacturingindustry?.TechnologicalForecastingandSocialChange,183,121893.10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121893Li,J.,Haider,Z.A.,Jin,X.andYuan,W.(2019).Corporatecontroversy,socialresponsibilityandmarketperformance:Internationalevidence.JournalofInternationalFinancialMarkets,InstitutionsandMoney,60,1-18.Li,Q.,Sharif,A.,Razzaq,A.andYu,Y.(2022).Doclimatetechnology,financialization,andsustainablefinanceimpedeenvironmentalchallenges?EvidencefromG10economies.TechnologicalForecastingandSocialChange,185,122095.Liberti,J.M.,andPetersen,M.A.(2019).Information:Hardandsoft.ReviewofCorporateFinanceStudies,8(1),1–41.https://doi.org/10.1093/rcfs/cfy009Lin,X.,Chang,S.C.,Chou,T.H.,Chen,S.C.andRuangkanjanases,A.(2021).Consumers’intentiontoadoptblockchainfoodtraceabilitytechnologytowardsorganicfoodproducts.InternationalJournalofEnvironmentalResearchandPublicHealth,18(3),912.10.3390/ijerph18030912Lins,K.V.,Servaes,H.andTamayo,A.(2017).Socialcapital,trust,andfirmperformance:Thevalueofcorporatesocialresponsibilityduringthefinancialcrisis.theJournalofFinance,72(4),1785-1824.Thispreprintresearchpaperhasnotbeenpeerreviewed.Electroniccopyavailableat:https://ssrn.com/abstract=4488108Preprintnotpeerreviewed19Lisha,L.,Mousa,S.,Arnone,G.,Muda,I.,Huerta-Soto,R.andShiming,Z.(2023).Naturalresources,greeninnovation,fintech,andsustainability:AfreshinsightfromBRICS.ResourcesPolicy,80,103119,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.103119.Liu,X.,Razzaq,A.,Shahzad,M.andIrfan,M.(2022).Technologicalchanges,financialdevelopmentandecologicalconsequences:acomparativestudyofdevelopedanddevelopingeconomies.TechnologicalForecastingandSocialChange,184,122004,10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122004Lu,J.andWang,J.(2021).Corporategovernance,law,culture,environmentalperformanceandCSRdisclosure:Aglobalperspective.JournalofInternationalFinancialMarkets,InstitutionsandMoney,70,101264.Macchiavello,E.andSiri,M.(2020).SustainableFinanceandFintech:CanTechnologyContributetoAchievingEnvironmentalGoals?APreliminaryAssessmentof‘GreenFinTech'(August13,2020).EuropeanBankingInstituteWorkingPaperSeries2020–no.71,AvailableatSSRN:https://ssrn.com/abstract=3672989orhttp://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3672989Macpherson,M.,Gasperini,A.andBosco,M.(2021).ArtificialIntelligenceandFinTechTechnologiesforESGDataandAnalysis(February15,2021).AvailableatSSRN:https://ssrn.com/abstract=3790774orhttp://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3790774Merello,P,Barberá,A.andDelaPoza,E.(2022).IsthesustainabilityprofileofFinTechcompaniesakeydriveroftheirvalue?,TechnologicalForecastingandSocialChange,174,121290.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121290.Mills,K.,andMcCarthy,B.(2017,April).HowbankscancompeteagainstanarmyofFinTechstart-ups.HarvardBusinessReview,13-20.Mirza,N.,Umar,M.,Afzal,A.andFirdousi,S.F.(2023).Theroleoffintechinpromotinggreenfinance,andprofitability:Evidencefromthebankingsectorintheeurozone.EconomicAnalysisandPolicy,78,33-40.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2023.02.001.Nguyen,L.T.andNguyen,K.V.(2020).Theimpactofcorporatesocialresponsibilityontheriskofcommercialbankswithdifferentlevelsoffinancialconstraint.Asia-PacificJournalofBusinessAdministration,13(1),98–116.https://doi.org/10.1108/APJBA-12-2019-0252.Mallin,C.,Farag,H.andOw-Yong,K.(2014).CorporatesocialresponsibilityandfinancialperformanceinIslamicbanks.JournalofEconomicBehavior&Organization,103,S21-S38.MoroVisconti,R.andMorea,D.(2020).HealthcareDigitalizationandPay-For-PerformanceIncentivesinSmartHospitalProjectFinancing.InternationalJournalofEnvironmentalResearchandPublicHealth,17(7),1-25.Mosteanu,N.R.andFaccia,A.(2020).Digitalsystemsandnewchallengesoffinancialmanagement–FinTech,XBRL,blockchainandcryptocurrencies.Quality-AccesstoSuccessJournal,21(174),159-166.Muganyi,T.,Yan,L.andPing,S.H.(2021).Greenfinance,fintechandenvironmentalprotection:EvidencefromChina.EnvironmentalScienceandEcotechnology,7,100107.10.1016/j.ese.2021.100107Murinde,V.,Rizopoulos,E.,andZachariadis,M.(2022).TheimpactoftheFinTechrevolutiononthefutureofbanking:Opportunitiesandrisks.InternationalReviewofFinancialAnalysis,81,102103,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102103.Thispreprintresearchpaperhasnotbeenpeerreviewed.Electroniccopyavailableat:https://ssrn.com/abstract=4488108Preprintnotpeerreviewed20Naeem,M.A.,Karim,S.,Jamasb,T.,andNepal,R.(2022a).Risktransmissionbetweengreenmarketsandcommodities.SSRNElectronicJournal.10.2139/ssrn.4037826.Naeem,M.A.,Pham,L.,Senthilkumar,A.,andKarim,S.(2022b).OilshocksandBRICmarkets:Evidencefromextremequantileapproach.EnergyEconomics.105932.Nassiry,D.(2018).TheroleofFintechinunlockinggreenfinance:policyinsightsfordevelopingcountries.ADBIWorkingPaperSeries.https://www.adb.org/publications/role-fintech-unlocking-green-financeOh,W.Y.,Chang,Y.K.andJung,R.(2019).Boardcharacteristicsandcorporatesocialresponsibility:doesfamilyinvolvementinmanagementmatter?.JournalofBusinessResearch,103,23-33.Ok,Y.andKim,J.(2019).Whichcorporatesocialresponsibilityperformanceaffectsthecostofequity?EvidencefromKorea.Sustainability,11(10),1–14.https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102947.Orlitzky,M.,Schmidt,F.L.andRynes,S.L.(2003).Corporatesocialandfinancialperformance:Ameta-analysis.Organizationstudies,24(3),403-441.Park,H.andKim,J.D.(2020).Transitiontowardsgreenbanking:roleoffinancialregulatorsandfinancialinstitutions.AsianJournalofSustainabilityandSocialResponsibility,5,1-25.10.1186/s41180-020-00034-3Philippon,T.(2016,July).TheFinTechOpportunity.WorkingPaperNo.22476,DepartmentofFinance;NationalBureauofEconomicResearch.Retrievedfromhttp://www.bis.org/events/conf160624/philippon_paper.pdf.Pizzi,S.,Corbo,L.andCaputo,A.(2021).FintechandSMEssustainablebusinessmodels:Reflectionsandconsiderationsforacirculareconomy,JournalofCleanerProduction,281,125217.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125217.PRI(PrinciplesforResponsibleInvesting)Report“TheEuropeanCommissionActionPlan”(July2018).Availableat:https://www.unpri.org/sustainable-financial-system/explaining-the-eu-action-plan-for-financing-sustainable-growth/3000.articleQuatrini,S.(2021).ChallengesandopportunitiestoscaleupsustainablefinanceaftertheCOVID-19crisis:Lessonsandpromisinginnovationsfromscienceandpractice.EcosystemServices,48,101240,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101240.Rangu,C.M.,Popescu,F.V.andLeu,D.M.(2022).KeyPillarsforFinTechandCybersecurity.ActaUniversitatisDanubius.OEconomica,18(1),194-210.Richardson,A.andXu,J.(2020).October.Carbontradingwithblockchain.InMathematicalResearchforBlockchainEconomy:2ndInternationalConferenceMARBLE2020,Vilamoura,Portugal(pp.105-124).Cham:SpringerInternationalPublishing.Rupeika-Apoga,R.andThalassinos,E.(2020).IdeasforaRegulatoryDefinitionofFinTech.InternationalJournalofEconomicsandBusinessAdministration,VIII.136-154.10.35808/ijeba/448.Sannino,G.,DiCarlo,F.andLucchese,M.(2020).CEOcharacteristicsandsustainabilitybusinessmodelinfinancialtechnologiesfirms:Primaryevidencefromtheutilizationofinnovativeplatforms.ManagementDecision,58(8),1779–1799.https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-10-2019-1360.Senyo,P.K.andOsabutey,E.L.C.(2020).Unearthingantecedentstofinancialinclusionthroughfintechinnovations.Technovation,98,102155.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102155.Thispreprintresearchpaperhasnotbeenpeerreviewed.Electroniccopyavailableat:https://ssrn.com/abstract=4488108Preprintnotpeerreviewed21Sharma,R.,Singh,G.andSharma,S.(2020).ModellinginternetbankingadoptioninFiji:Adevelopingcountryperspective.InternationalJournalofInformationManagement,53,102116https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102116.Strielkowski,W.,Samoilikova,A.,Smutka,L.,Civín,L.andLieonov,S.(2022).Dominanttrendsinintersectoralresearchonfundinginnovationinbusinesscompanies:Abibliometricanalysisapproach.JournalofInnovation&Knowledge,7(4).100271,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100271.Tao,R.,Su,C.W.,Naqvi,B.andRizvi,S.K.A.(2022).CanFintechdevelopmentpavethewayforatransitiontowardslow-carboneconomy:Aglobalperspective.TechnologicalForecastingandSocialChange,174,121278.Valverde,S.C.andFernández,F.R.(2020).FinancialDigitalization:Banks,Fintech,Bigtech,AndConsumers.JournalofFinancialManagement,MarketsandInstitutions(JFMMI),WorldScientificPublishingCo.Pte.Ltd.,8(01),1-13.VanTulder,R.,Rodrigues,S.B.,Mirza,H.andSexsmith,K.(2021).TheUN’ssustainabledevelopmentgoals:canmultinationalenterprisesleadthedecadeofaction?.JournalofInternationalBusinessPolicy,4(1),1-21.10.1057/s42214-020-00095-1Wu,Y.,Lee,C.C.,Lee,C.C.andPeng,D.(2022).Geographicproximityandcorporateinvestmentefficiency:Evidencefromhigh-speedrailconstructioninChina.JournalofBankingandFinance,140,106510.10.1016/j.jbankfin.2022.106510Wu,M.W.andShen,C.H.(2013).Corporatesocialresponsibilityinthebankingindustry:Motivesandfinancialperformance.JournalofBanking&Finance,37(9),3529-3547.Yan,C.,Siddik,A.B.,Yong,L.,Dong,Q.,Zheng,G.W.andRahman,M.N.(2022).Atwo-stagedSEM-artificialneuralnetworkapproachtoanalyzetheimpactofFinTechadoptiononthesustainabilityperformanceofbankingfirms:Themediatingeffectofgreenfinanceandinnovation.Systems,10(5).10.3390/systems10050148Zetzsche,D.,Buckley,R.,Arner,D.,andBarberis,J.(2017).FromFinTechtoTechFin:TheRegulatoryChallengesofData-DrivenFinance.EuropeanBankingInstituteWorkingPaperSeries2017-No.6,UniversityofHongKongFacultyofLawResearchPaperNo.2017/007,UniversityofLuxembourgLawWorkingPaperNo.2017-001,AvailableatSSRN:https://ssrn.com/abstract=2959925orhttp://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2959925Zetzsche,D.A.,Arner,D.W.,Buckley,R.P.andKaiser-Yücel,A.(2020).Fintechtoolkit:smartregulatoryandmarketapproachestofinancialtechnologyinnovation.UniversityofHongKongFacultyofLawResearchPaper,(2020/027).10.2139/ssrn.3598142Thispreprintresearchpaperhasnotbeenpeerreviewed.Electroniccopyavailableat:https://ssrn.com/abstract=4488108Preprintnotpeerreviewed

1、当您付费下载文档后,您只拥有了使用权限,并不意味着购买了版权,文档只能用于自身使用,不得用于其他商业用途(如 [转卖]进行直接盈利或[编辑后售卖]进行间接盈利)。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。
3、如文档内容存在违规,或者侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权等,请点击“违规举报”。

碎片内容

碳中和
已认证
内容提供者

碳中和

确认删除?
回到顶部
微信客服
  • 管理员微信
QQ客服
  • QQ客服点击这里给我发消息
客服邮箱