【推荐】世界经济论坛-供应链中的排放测量:商业现实和挑战(英)-2023.11-21页VIP专享VIP免费

Emissions Measurement
in Supply Chains:
Business Realities and
Challenges
WHITE PAPER
NOVEMBER 2023
Contents
Images: Getty Images
© 2023 World Economic Forum. All rights
reserved. No part of this publication may
be reproduced or transmitted in any form
or by any means, including photocopying
and recording, or by any information
storage and retrieval system.
Disclaimer
This document is published by the World
Economic Forum as a contribution to a
project, insight area or interaction. The
findings, interpretations and conclusions
expressed herein are a result of a
collaborative process facilitated and
endorsed by the World Economic Forum
but whose results do not necessarily
represent the views of the World Economic
Forum, the OECD, or Business at OECD
(BIAC), nor the entirety of their Members,
Partners or other stakeholders.
Executive summary
Introduction
1 Sectoral snapshots
1.1 Agriculture and food
1.2 Mining
1.3 Steel
2 Implications
2.1 Features of well-functioning measurement systems
2.2 Existing initiatives point in the right direction
2.3 Key questions for future dialogue
Contributors
Endnotes
3
4
5
9
11
12
14
15
16
16
18
19
Emissions Measurement in Supply Chains: Business Realities and Challenges 2
Executive summary
Increased visibility of supply chain emissions can
make a critical contribution to decarbonizing the
global economy. It can inform corporate decisions
around procurement, product design and research
and development (R&D), as well as financial
decision-making by investors. These promises
cannot be realized if market actors are unable to
meet reporting requirements, or if the resulting data
are not trustworthy. Policy-makers must therefore
carefully navigate the question of supply chain
emissions measurement.
In addition to measuring, reporting and addressing
their direct emissions (Scope 1) and indirect
emissions from purchased energy (Scope 2),
companies are increasingly facing far-reaching
expectations to track emissions from upstream and
downstream activities in their value chains (Scope 3).
Scope 3 reporting has largely been voluntary, driven
by consumer, buyer, investor, employee and civil
society expectations, among others. However, a
number of regulatory initiatives are underway to
make this a mandatory requirement.
Commonly used reporting standards provide some
guidance, but challenges remain as reporting
approaches proliferate; companies determine
different emission boundaries, and use different
calculation and allocation methods; data can be
costly, inaccurate or unavailable; and certification
mechanisms are not yet well established. The
complexity of global supply chains exacerbates
these challenges.
Business interviews also highlight sector-
specific challenges to measurement and
reporting. For example:
Agriculture and food: Farm production is
fragmented; differences in geography and
biological systems affect emissions, which
complicates estimates; comparability is difficult
where calculation methods vary; and small
producers lack the capacity to provide data.
Mining: Downstream emissions reporting
remains elusive due to the lack of verified data,
varied standards and limited incentives to work
with downstream actors; and for iron-ore and
coal producers, the steel industry is an important
customer but has several different standards.
Steel: There is a lack of common standards
and incomplete reporting; production
processes and technologies vary, as do their
environmental impact; as a share of total
emissions, Scope 3 is lower and downstream
reporting not well developed.
As there is no one-size-fits-all approach, industry
initiatives have played an important role in testing
different measurement approaches and gradually
bringing about alignment among members in some
sectors. Especially where supply chains are complex,
concerns about substantial costs and other burdens
remain. Questions also arise on how emissions
that fall outside companies’ direct management or
ownership should best be addressed.
Well-functioning, interoperable systems for
measuring emissions can support decarbonization
of the global economy. They must balance
accuracy with feasibility, particularly for small and
medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and firms in
developing countries. Otherwise, there is a real risk
that measurement and reporting obligations reduce
competitiveness and act as barriers to trade, while
not achieving their main purpose: fostering effective
climate action globally.
The key questions for policy-makers, businesses
and the broader community include:
How to strike the right balance between
accuracy and feasibility?
How can governments support the
development of common standards?
How can governments encourage interoperability?
How will measurement and reporting be verified?
How can small and medium enterprises (SMEs)
and firms in developing countries be supported?
How can digital tools help?
Measuring and reporting emissions in supply
chains can be a key lever for decarbonization
globally, but inclusive discussions are needed
to standardize approaches
Emissions Measurement in Supply Chains: Business Realities and Challenges 3
EmissionsMeasurementinSupplyChains:BusinessRealitiesandChallengesWHITEPAPERNOVEMBER2023Images:GettyImagesContentsExecutivesummary3Introduction41Sectoralsnapshots51.1Agricultureandfood91.2Mining111.3Steel122Implications142.1Featuresofwell-functioningmeasurementsystems152.2Existinginitiativespointintherightdirection162.3Keyquestionsforfuturedialogue16Contributors18Endnotes19DisclaimerThisdocumentispublishedbytheWorldEconomicForumasacontributiontoaproject,insightareaorinteraction.Thefindings,interpretationsandconclusionsexpressedhereinarearesultofacollaborativeprocessfacilitatedandendorsedbytheWorldEconomicForumbutwhoseresultsdonotnecessarilyrepresenttheviewsoftheWorldEconomicForum,theOECD,orBusinessatOECD(BIAC),northeentiretyoftheirMembers,Partnersorotherstakeholders.©2023WorldEconomicForum.Allrightsreserved.Nopartofthispublicationmaybereproducedortransmittedinanyformorbyanymeans,includingphotocopyingandrecording,orbyanyinformationstorageandretrievalsystem.EmissionsMeasurementinSupplyChains:BusinessRealitiesandChallenges2ExecutivesummaryMeasuringandreportingemissionsinsupplychainscanbeakeyleverfordecarbonizationglobally,butinclusivediscussionsareneededtostandardizeapproachesIncreasedvisibilityofsupplychainemissionscanwithdownstreamactors;andforiron-oreandmakeacriticalcontributiontodecarbonizingthecoalproducers,thesteelindustryisanimportantglobaleconomy.Itcaninformcorporatedecisionscustomerbuthasseveraldifferentstandards.aroundprocurement,productdesignandresearchanddevelopment(R&D),aswellasfinancial–Steel:Thereisalackofcommonstandardsdecision-makingbyinvestors.Thesepromisesandincompletereporting;productioncannotberealizedifmarketactorsareunabletoprocessesandtechnologiesvary,asdotheirmeetreportingrequirements,oriftheresultingdataenvironmentalimpact;asashareoftotalarenottrustworthy.Policy-makersmustthereforeemissions,Scope3isloweranddownstreamcarefullynavigatethequestionofsupplychainreportingnotwelldeveloped.emissionsmeasurement.Asthereisnoone-size-fits-allapproach,industryInadditiontomeasuring,reportingandaddressinginitiativeshaveplayedanimportantroleintestingtheirdirectemissions(Scope1)andindirectdifferentmeasurementapproachesandgraduallyemissionsfrompurchasedenergy(Scope2),bringingaboutalignmentamongmembersinsomecompaniesareincreasinglyfacingfar-reachingsectors.Especiallywheresupplychainsarecomplex,expectationstotrackemissionsfromupstreamandconcernsaboutsubstantialcostsandotherburdensdownstreamactivitiesintheirvaluechains(Scope3).remain.Questionsalsoariseonhowemissionsthatfalloutsidecompanies’directmanagementorScope3reportinghaslargelybeenvoluntary,drivenownershipshouldbestbeaddressed.byconsumer,buyer,investor,employeeandcivilsocietyexpectations,amongothers.However,aWell-functioning,interoperablesystemsfornumberofregulatoryinitiativesareunderwaytomeasuringemissionscansupportdecarbonizationmakethisamandatoryrequirement.oftheglobaleconomy.Theymustbalanceaccuracywithfeasibility,particularlyforsmallandCommonlyusedreportingstandardsprovidesomemedium-sizedenterprises(SMEs)andfirmsinguidance,butchallengesremainasreportingdevelopingcountries.Otherwise,thereisarealriskapproachesproliferate;companiesdeterminethatmeasurementandreportingobligationsreducedifferentemissionboundaries,andusedifferentcompetitivenessandactasbarrierstotrade,whilecalculationandallocationmethods;datacanbenotachievingtheirmainpurpose:fosteringeffectivecostly,inaccurateorunavailable;andcertificationclimateactionglobally.mechanismsarenotyetwellestablished.ThecomplexityofglobalsupplychainsexacerbatesThekeyquestionsforpolicy-makers,businessesthesechallenges.andthebroadercommunityinclude:Businessinterviewsalsohighlightsector-–Howtostriketherightbalancebetweenspecificchallengestomeasurementandaccuracyandfeasibility?reporting.Forexample:–Howcangovernmentssupportthe–Agricultureandfood:Farmproductionisdevelopmentofcommonstandards?fragmented;differencesingeographyandbiologicalsystemsaffectemissions,which–Howcangovernmentsencourageinteroperability?complicatesestimates;comparabilityisdifficultwherecalculationmethodsvary;andsmall–Howwillmeasurementandreportingbeverified?producerslackthecapacitytoprovidedata.–Howcansmallandmediumenterprises(SMEs)–Mining:Downstreamemissionsreportingandfirmsindevelopingcountriesbesupported?remainselusiveduetothelackofverifieddata,variedstandardsandlimitedincentivestowork–Howcandigitaltoolshelp?EmissionsMeasurementinSupplyChains:BusinessRealitiesandChallenges3IntroductionFirmsareincreasinglyaskedtomeasuresupplychainemissions,butpoordataandinconsistentstandardscurrentlymakethisharderthanitshouldbe.ContextCompaniesareincreasinglyexpectedtomeasure,reportandactonemissionsintheirsupplychains.Theseexpectationscomefromconsumers,businesspartners,regulators,investors,employeesandcivilsociety.TherearemanyreasonsforcollectingScope3emissionsdata:growingconsumerawareness;growingdemandfortransparencyfromcivilsociety;newlegislationsuchastheCorporateSustainabilityReportingDirective;andourcommitmentstotheScience-BasedTargetsinitiative.Leadingfoodanddrinksmanufacturer1Forexample,inadditiontoreportingontheirdirectupstreamanddownstreamtransportandgreenhousegasemissions(Scope1)andindirectdistribution,andtheuseofsoldgoods)formtheemissionsfrompurchasedenergy(Scope2),firmsbulkoffirms’Scope3emissions.3areincreasinglyreportingemissionsassociatedwithupstreamanddownstreamactivitiesintheirScope3reportinghasbeenvoluntary,withvaluechains(Scope3emissions).TheconceptofmanybusinessesdoingsotogainacompetitiveScope3isbroaderthansupplychainemissions–advantagethroughbetterinsights,toattractitalsoincludes,forinstance,emissionsassociatedsustainability-focusedinvestors,andtodemonstratewithemployeecommutingandinvestments.2Intheircommitmenttoenvironmentalsustainability.mostsectors,however,supplychainemissionsHowever,majordevelopmentsareunderway(suchasfrompurchasedgoodsandservices,towardsmandatoryScope3reporting(Figure1).EmissionsMeasurementinSupplyChains:BusinessRealitiesandChallenges4FIGURE1Keycross-sectoraldevelopmentsSustainabilityreportingVoluntarytargetsettingMandatoryduestandardsdiligenceScience-BasedTargetsInitiative(SBTi)InternationalSustainabilityStandardsBoard(establishedin2015)EUCorporateSustainabilityDueDiligence(establishedin2021)Directive(proposed)Target-settingprocessusedby4000+businesses.SustainabilitydisclosurestandardspublishedinRequirescompaniestoestablishproceduresto2023consolidateseveralpreviousinitiatives,Allcompaniesthatsubmittargetsnowcompleteaaddressenvironmentorhumanrightsharmswithinprovidinginformationtoinvestors.scope3inventory.Criteriafornear-termtargetsalsotheirsupplychains.Requiresdisclosureofscope1,2and3emissions.requiresascope3reductiontargetifthesecompriseScope3reportingisinlinewithGHGProtocol.morethan40%ofacompany’semissions.WouldobligatecompaniesofacertainsizethatUsessinglematerialityapproach,focusedonhaveidentifiedclimatechangeasaprincipalriskinformationnecessaryforinvestors’decisions.IsintheprocessofdevelopingresourcestoguidetheorimpacttoincludeemissionsreductionFrom2024,assumesresponsibilitiesoftheadoption,implementation,assessmentandtrackingobjectivesintheirbusinessplans.Task-ForceonClimate-relatedDisclosures(TCFD).ofscope3targetsinarobustandconsistentway.ThefinaldirectiveisthesubjectofnegotiationsEuropeanSustainabilityReportingStandardsThisguidancewillevaluatescope3targetboundarybetweenEUinstitutionsandwilllikelycomeinto(establishedin2023)criteriaandmaterialitythresholds.Itwillalsoassessforcein2024attheearliest.howdifferentinterventionscanhelpachieveForusebycompaniessubjecttotheEUCorporatevalue-chaindecarbonizationtargets.GermanActonCorporateDueDiligenceSustainabilityReportingDirective.ObligationsinSupplyChains(2023)Requiresscope3reportingunlessacompanydeemsVoluntarydisclosureitnotmaterial(whichmustthenbeexplained).Includesenvironmentalduediligencerequirements.UsesadoublematerialityapproachtoshareCDP(formerlyCarbonDisclosureProject)informationonsustainabilityimpactsaswellashow(establishedin2000)Mandatorydisclosurethecompanyisimpactedbythese.GlobalenvironmentaldisclosuresystemforEUCorporateSustainabilityReportingCarbonfootprintcompanies,cities,statesandregions,coveringDirective(2023)standardsclimatechange,wateranddeforestation.Appliestolargefirms,listedSMEsandnon-EUGreenhouseGasProtocol(establishedin1998)Over18,700companiesdisclosedimpactsin2022firmswithalargepresenceintheEU.(+42%versus2021).ProvideswidelyusedframeworkstomeasureGHGFirmsneedtoreportinlinewiththeEuropeanemissions,includingScope3.CDPSupplyChaininitiative:340+firmswith$6.4SustainabilityReportingStandards.trillioninpurchasingpoweraskingsupplierstoInternationalOrganizationforStandardizationdiscloseimpactstoCDP.USSecuritiesandExchangeCommission(ISO)EnhancementandStandardizationofClimate-relatedDisclosuresforInvestorsProvidesstandardsforreportingcarbonfootprints(proposed)oforganizations,projectsandproducts.Underthecurrentproposal,companieswouldbePartnershipforCarbonTransparency(PACT)requiredtodisclosescope3emissionsifthesearematerialoriftheyhavesettargets.Providesguidelinesforproduct-levelemissionsdataaccountingandexchange.JapanFinancialServicesAgency(FSA)corporatedisclosureamendments(2023)Mandatorysustainabilitydisclosuresforcertainlistedcompanies,basedonTCFD.Source:Authors.Note:Theselistsarenon-exhaustive,anddonotreflectindustry-specificinitiatives.Inadditiontofirm-levelreporting,supplychainaproduct.4ISOalsohasotherspecificemissionsemissionsarealsorelevantfordeterminingproductreportingstandards(e.g.forsteel).Arecentcarbonfootprints(PCF).Demandisgrowingforregulatorydevelopment,theEuropeanUnionPCFdataasaninputinScope3calculations.The(EU)CarbonBorderAdjustmentMechanismInternationalOrganizationforStandardization(ISO)(CBAM),requirescertainfirmstoreportproduct-standardISO14067:2018setsoutspecificationslevelemissions,includingembeddedupstreamforreportingPCFconsideringthefulllifecycleofemissionsincertaininstances.(SeeBox1.)EmissionsMeasurementinSupplyChains:BusinessRealitiesandChallenges5BOX1ReportingrequirementsundertheEU’sCarbonBorderAdjustmentMechanism(CBAM)CBAM,whichcameintoforceon1October2023,TheEuropeanCommissionhasadoptedanrequiresimporterstoreportondirectandindirectimplementingregulationforreportingobligationsemissionsembeddedincertaingoodsimportedduringthetransitionperiodandprovidedintotheEU.5Followingatransitionperiod,accompanyingguidanceforimportersandforeignimporterswillhavetostartpayingleviesfromproducers.6Companiescanreportinoneofthree1January2026oncarbon-intensiveimportedways:1)bydeterminingemissionsbasedongoodsequivalenttothosechargedtodomesticactivitydataandcalculationfactorsorbasedonthegoodsundertheEU’sEmissionsTradingSchemecontinuousmeasurementoftherelevantGHGinthe(ETS).Cement,electricity,fertilizers,ironandsteel,fluegas(theEU’smethodology);2)anequivalentaluminiumandhydrogenarecurrentlycovered,methodbasedonacarbonpricingschemeorwithplanstocoverallsectorsthatfallundertheemissionsmonitoringschemeinforcewheretheETSby2030.Formanyofthesectorscoveredinstallationislocated(untilDecember2024);orbyCBAM,theregulationnotestherelevant3)usingdefaultreferencevalues(untilJuly2024).“precursors”(materialinputs)whoseemissionsForcomplexgoods,thereissomeleeway:20%ofneedtobeincludedinthereportedembeddedembeddedemissionsmaybereportedbasedonemissionsoftheimportedgood.estimatesbytheoperatorsofinstallations.7Understandingsupplychainemissionscanbeafor50%ofglobalemissions,8andscope3accountspowerfulleverforclimateaction(Figure2).Forfor75%ofcompanies’emissionsonaverage.9example,justeightsupplychainsareresponsibleFIGURE2EstimatedsharesofemissionsscopespersectorAgriculturalcommoditiesCapitalgoodsCementChemicalsCoalConstructionElectricityutilitiesFinancialservicesFood,beverage&tobaccoGeneralMetals&miningOil&gasPaper&forestryRealestateSteelTransportOEMsTransportservices0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%Source:CDP,“CDPTechnicalNote:RelevanceofScope3CategoriesbySector”.10Scope1Scope2Scope3originalequipmentmanufacturers.However,whilegreatertransparencyonsupplychainitalsocomeswithanumberofchallengesandmayemissionscanbeapowerfulleverfordecarbonization,requiresignificantcompanyefforts.EmissionsMeasurementinSupplyChains:BusinessRealitiesandChallenges6ChallengesExistingstandardsprovideessentialguidance,butThegrowingdemandforfirm-specificinformationmeasuringsupplychainemissionsentailsmanyalsorequiresfirmstoallocatetheirenterprise-orchoices.Forexample,appropriateemissionsplant-levelemissionsacrossdifferentproductsorboundariesneedtobedetermined,andcompaniesservices.Thechoiceofallocationmethodcanagainmayneedtochoosewhethertouseaspend-basedbecomplexandmayinfluenceresults.Firmsalsoapproach,averagedataorsupplier-specificestimates.oftenneedtoreporttoawiderangeofstakeholders,whomayrequiredifferentreportingformats.Ideally,supplychainemissionswouldbetrackedusingreliablefirm-specificprimarydata,butThecomplexityofsupplychainsamplifiesthesethesecanbedifficultandcostlytoobtain.Datachallenges.Somefirmshavethousandsofdirectquality,accuracyandavailabilityposesignificantsuppliers,andwhenprecedingstagesofthechallenges.Suppliersandcustomersmaynotsupplychainareincluded,manymoresuppliersalwaysdisclosetheirenvironmentaldata,includingmaybeinvolvedindirectly.Reportingrequirementsduetoprivacyconcernsorconcernsaboutmayalsobedisproportionatelyheavyonsmallrevealingsensitivebusinessinformation.Datamayandmedium-sizedbusinessesandfirmsinnotbeavailableinrealtime,orthedatamaybedevelopingcountries.incompleteorinconsistent.Dataqualitycanvarysignificantlydependingontheregion,industryandBasedoninterviewswithindustryexperts,thisindividualsupplier,leadingtoinaccuracies.paperprovidesaframeworkfordiscussiononemissionsmeasurementinsupplychains.ItCalculationmethodologiesmaydiffer,andemissionsincludesanoverviewofmeasurementandreportingfactors–theratiobetweenthepollutantemittedandapproachesinthreesectors–agricultureandtheactivityconducted–maybesubjecttovariationsfood;mining;andsteel.Itoffersasnapshotofintime,locationandothervariables.Atpresent,thethepreparednessandchallengesofsupplychainemissionsfactorsusedareoftenbasedonindustryemissionsreporting,andconcludeswithkeyaveragesratherthansupplier-specificemissions,questionsforpolicy-makers,particularlytradeandwhichtakesignificantresearchtobuild.economicofficials,toconsider.EmissionsMeasurementinSupplyChains:BusinessRealitiesandChallenges71SectoralsnapshotsBusinessinterviewshighlightthatfirmsincreasinglymeasuresupplychainemissions,butencounterpracticalchallenges.EmissionsMeasurementinSupplyChains:BusinessRealitiesandChallenges81.1AgricultureandfoodFoodsupply-chainemissionsoftenfirmsarealreadyquantifyingtheirScope3emissionsforotherreasons,suchasconsumerTheglobalfoodsupplychainaccountsforandemandortomanageclimaterisks.Export-estimatedone-thirdoftotalhuman-causedorientedfirmsinterviewedforthispaperindicatedemissions.11Thevastmajorityoftheseemissionsexpectationsofforeignbuyersasamoreimportantoccurthroughland-usechange(e.g.deforestationfactorthangovernmentpolicy.toclearland)andfarmproduction(e.g.emissionsfromfertilizeruseorcattle“burps”).Reportingstandardsintheagri-foodsectorRecentyearshaveseenstronggrowthininitiativestomeasureandcommunicateAsinothersectors,emissionsreportingintheenvironmentalimpactsoffoodproducts,includingagri-foodsectortypicallydrawsonGHGProtocolnotonlygreenhousegas(GHG)emissionsbutandISOstandards,complementedwithsector-alsowateruse,waterpollution,biodiversityspecificguidance(seeFigure3).13GHGProtocolisimpacts,andmore.12currentlydevelopingitsLandSectorandRemovalsGuidance,whichwillexplainhowfirmsshouldWhilesomeeffortsarelinkedtoregulatoryaccountforemissionsandremovalsfromlandusedevelopments(liketheEUCorporateSustainabilityandbiogenicproducts(amongotherissues).14ReportingDirective(CSRD),whichrequiresmanySectororganizationshavealsoproducedspecificfirmsintheEUtoreportScope3emissions),carbonfootprintstandardsfordairyandbeef.15FIGURE3ReportingstandardsinfoodsupplychainsAgriculture/FoodEmissionsfactorsandfarm-levelcalculationtoolsUSdairyguidanceInternationalDairyFederation,GlobalRoundtable(Scope1,2,3)forSustainableBeefCarbonfootprintguidanceAgricultureGuidanceFAOLivestockEnvironmentalLandSector&RemovalsAssessmentandPerformance(LEAP)AcrosssectorsPACTPathfinder–Scope3andProductCarbonFootprintguidanceCorporate&ISO14064-1GHGemissionsISO14067ProductProductScope3atorganizationlevelCarbonFootprintLifeCycleFirm-levelISO14040/14044Product-levelSource:OECD.LifecycleassessmentSpecificGeneralEmissionsMeasurementinSupplyChains:BusinessRealitiesandChallenges9Fragmentedsuppliersandemissionsareoftenthelargestcomponentofvariabilitytheirupstreamscope3emissions.RetailersarealsorespondingtoincreasedconsumerinterestinTheagricultureandfoodsectorfacessomeuniquecarbonfootprintswithapushtowardseco-labels.practicalchallengesinestimatingemissions.Measurementofemissionsisdifficult,inpartAleadingEuropeanretailerexplainedinaninterviewbecausefarmproductionishighlyfragmented:thatitsScope3estimatesforagricultureandfoodglobally,therearemorethan600millionfarms.16arecurrentlymodelledestimates,usingemissionsfactorstomultiplythepurchasedvolumes,butthatAnotherfactorcomplicatingemissionsworkisunderwaytorefinethisusingmoregranularmeasurementisthatdifferencesin,forinstance,secondarydataandevenprimarydatafromfarmerssoils,climateorweatherconditionscanaffectproducingfortheretailer’sprivatelabel.Gatheringemissions.Emissionsmeasurementthusoftenprimarydataforitsprivate-labelfreshmilkcameusesmodelledestimates,whichcanvaryfrominatlessthan1%ofthetotalproductioncost,buthigh-levelapproximations(e.g.averageemissionsthesecostscouldgoupifgreatergranularityandfactors)tomoregranular,bottom-upcalculationsproductcoveragewererequired.usingfarm-leveldata.17Moreover,informationishardertoobtainforPrimaryversussecondarydataproductssoldthroughglobalsupplychains,liketropicalfruit.EmissionscalculationmodelscanvaryRetailersaroundtheglobeareincreasinglytrackingtoo,whichmakesitdifficultforretailerstocompareScope3emissionsandsigninguptotheScience-numbers.OneleadingfoodanddrinkmanufacturerBasedTargetsinitiative(SBTi).Food-relatedexplainedthattheirScope3calculationscurrentlyuseemissionsfactorsfromthescientificliteratureratherthanprimarydata,astheyworrythatusingsupplier-provideddatamightintroducemoremeasurementerror.[W]earefacingbigchallengeswithregardtothecomparabilityofcarbondata.Dependingonthesupplychain,wetrytouseasingletoolforallourgrowers/farmers.However,ininternationalsupplychainsthechallengeismuchhigher.Manysuppliersendedupdevelopingin-housesolutions.Thishascreatedanissueinthesensethatthedataisreallydifficulttouseforbenchmarkingsuppliers.LeadingEuropeanretailerInterviewswithcompaniesexportingbeefanddairyReportingproliferationproductsrevealedthatthesefirmsareinvestinginemissionstracking,inpartlinkedtocustomerManyintervieweesexpressedconcernaboutademandfurtherdownthesupplychain.Thisoftenfragmentedreportinglandscape.Industryplatformsreliesonfarm-specificcarbonfootprintestimates.Onecouldplayaroleinhelpingtounifythereportingintervieweeemphasizedthattherealbarriershereareprocess.Mandatorydisclosurescouldsupportsuchnotaboutcost,butratheraboutexecution,capacity,effortsbystreamliningafragmentedlandscape–oraccesstodataandthelike.Anotherfirmdescribedcouldunderminethemifdifferentjurisdictionsadoptpartneringwitharesearchinstitutetodevelopmoredifferentrequirements.accurateemissionsfactors,aswellasusingtraceabilityandsatellitetechnologytoincreaseaccuracy.Alotofresourcesarespentonreportingonthesamemetricsindifferentways.Stakeholders,investors,customers…allhavedifferentrequirementsforhowwereportthedata.Thissituationoftenleadstoconfusionamongnon-experts.Asaconsumer-facingcompany,weworrythatitmayreducetrustinourreporting.LeadingfoodanddrinkmanufacturerEmissionsMeasurementinSupplyChains:BusinessRealitiesandChallenges101.2MiningMining,theextractionofvaluablematerialsfromHowever,emergingfinancialdisclosuremandatestheearth,servesasthefoundationfornumerousandthelaunchofthenewInternationalSustainabilitysupplychains,spanningmanufacturing,agricultureStandardsBoard(ISSB)standardsthatincorporateandenergyproducts.TheminingindustryitselftherecommendationsoftheTaskForceonClimate-encompassesamultifacetedsupplychain,includingrelatedFinancialDisclosures(TCFD)areexpectedtoextraction,processing,gradinganddistributionofenableconvergence.Additionally,initiativesliketherawmaterials.EachstagepresentsopportunitiesInternationalCouncilonMiningandMetals’(ICMM)fordecarbonizationthroughoperationalefficiency,alignmentexerciseandtheCoalitiononMaterialselectrificationandrenewableenergyintegration.18EmissionsTransparency(COMET)aimtocreateaMiningiscentraltothecleanenergytransitiongivenharmonizedGHGcalculationframeworkapplicabletheessentialroleofmetalsandmineralsinlow-toallmineralsupplychains.21Oneintervieweecarbontechnologies(suchasbatteriesforelectricrecognizedthatamoreevolutionaryprocesstowardsvehicles,solarpanelsorwindturbines).19convergenceisnecessaryastheindustrytestsoutdifferentmethodologies.Scope1and2emissionsintheminingsectoraccountforlessthan10%oftotalemissionsbytheDownstreamemissionssector20andareonlysignificantintheprocessingchallengesstageforcertainproducts.Scope3emissionsincludeemissionsrelatedtoR&Dactivities,machineryusageTheminingindustry’sScope3reportingforandrawmaterialtransportation.However,mostdownstreamindustriesremainsinitsinfancy,Scope3emissionsoccurdownstreamincustomerrelyingpredominantlyonestimatesratherthanindustries,complicatingtheassessment.verifieddata.WhileincentivesexisttoworkwithupstreamsupplierstomonitorcarbonfootprintsReportingstandardsinminingandtointroducelow-carbontechnologies,thedownstreamscenarioisdifferent.AsoneindustryTheminingindustry’sdiverseproductrangeandexpertnoted,thereisaperceivedlackofcontrolprocessingmethodshaveledtothedevelopmentandincentivetomonitoremissionswhentheofmultiplemethodologiesandstandardsforcarbononusofdecarbonizationlieswithanothersector.measurementthatarenotalwaysfullyaligned.VariedstandardsindownstreamindustriesfurtherWhiletheGHGProtocolandISOstandardsformcomplicatedatacollaboration.However,thepushthebasis,theirbroadprinciplesaresubjecttotowardsSBTitargets,whichmandatetheinclusionvariousinterpretationswhenimplementedforofScope3emissionswhentheyexceed40%ofaspecificproductsorproduction“routes”,causingcompany’stotalemissions,isgraduallychangingdiscrepanciesacrosscompaniesandproducts.thislandscape.22Scope3reportingismainlyupstreamforpurchasedgoods,materials,fuelsandtransport.Wearenotlookingthatmuchatthedownstreamsidegiventhebranchingoutofthevaluechainandlackofcontroloveruseoftheoutput.Thisisstillvoluntarybutwillbecomemandatory.IndustryassociationInter-industryinteroperability:standards,poseschallenges.Developingproduct-Miningandsteelleveldata,suchaslifecycleassessment(LCA)methods,becomesarduousintheabsenceofForminingfirmsproducingironoreandcoal,goodalignmentofmeasurementmethodologiesthesteelindustryisaprimarycustomerandaanddefinitionsofproductsacrossthesupplysignificantcarbonemitter.Thelackofconsensuschain.Anotherissueisthepotentialfordoubleoncarbonmeasurementinthesteelindustrycountingwhenaddingtheemissionsofironore,(seenextcasestudy),coupledwithaplethoraofcoalandsteelcompaniesthatbelongtothesamesupplychain.Technicalsolutionsexist,butrelyontheuseofcomparabledata.Forsomeofourcustomers,thereisnotalotofconfidenceintheaccuracyofthereporting,whilesomeothercustomersmaynotreportatall.Aggregatingthisinformationisdifficult(…).Ifallcompaniesdownstreamreportedscope1and2emissionsreliably,thenourscope3reportingwouldbeeasier.LeadingminingcompanyEmissionsMeasurementinSupplyChains:BusinessRealitiesandChallenges111.3SteelAccordingtoInternationalEnergyAgency(IEA)sourcingstrategies.Vastquantitiesofcapitalwilldata,thesteelindustryaccountsforaround2.8needtobedirectedtowardsthiseffort.Astudygigatonnesofcarbondioxide(CO2)emissionsperofthelargeststeelproducersacrossdifferentyear,equalto8%ofglobalenergyemissions.23regionshighlightsthatalmostallofthemhavesetMovingtonet-zeroemissionswillrequireimportantdecarbonizationtargets,whiletwo-thirdshavesetatransformationsintechnologies,processesandnet-zerotarget.24FIGURE4Snapshotofstatisticsforthesteelindustry7-9%1.951,016€1.5billiontonnessteelplantsbillionSteelindustry'sshareofglobalemissionsGlobalsteelinRecentequityfundingforproductionin2021agreenhydrogensteel89planttargeting5millioncountriestonnesperyearby2030haveanannualcapacityof3billiontonnesSource:Authors,basedonWorldSteelAssociation(2020),25WorldSteelAssociation(2022),26GlobalEnergyMonitor(2023)27andH2GreenSteel28(2023).Astheproductionofsteelisenergyintensive,theDifferentmeasuringstickssectorhasimportantScope1and2emissions.However,emissionsleveldependsontheWhilethecompaniesinterviewedhighlightedtheproductionprocessandtypeofsupplychain.importanceofdevelopingcommonstandardsandTherearethreemainsteel-producing“routes”:(1)methodologiesforcarbonemissionsmeasurementintegratedproductionfromironoreusingblasttotrackprogressanddriveeffortstowardsfurnacesforironmakingandthenbasicoxygendecarbonization,thestateofplayremainsfragmented.furnacesforsteelmaking;(2)secondaryproductionfromscrapsteelusingelectricarcfurnaces(EAF);TheWorldSteelAssociation(worldsteel)hasand(3)productionbasedondirectreducediron,developedaCO2methodologyforsite-levelalsousingEAF.Onaverage,EAFproduces71%emissionsthataimstobeapracticaltooladaptedtolessCO2pertonneofsteel.29Recyclingsteelallsteel-producingroutes.Asecondsetofstandards(scrap-basedproduction)alsolowersthecarbonforcarbonmeasurementcomesfromISOandfootprint,butthereiscurrentlynotenoughscrapbuildsonworldsteelwork.However,theISO14404tocoveranincreasingdemandforsteelaroundserieshasseparatestandardsforeachofthethreetheworld.routes.Finally,athirdsetofstandardscomesfromtheResponsibleSteelinitiativewhichalsoprovidesDownstreamemissionsarealsosignificantcertificationandindependentverification.sincesteelinputsareusedinavarietyoffinalindustries,suchasconstructionandmotorAllthesestandardsfollowthedefinitionsandvehicles.SteelproducersarealsoincreasinglyprinciplesoftheGHGProtocol.However,theydifferunderpressuretoprovideinformationontheirinscopefortheemissionsreported,particularlycarbonfootprinttocustomers.TheserequestswhenitcomestoScope3.Inaddition,theydoaretypicallyattheproductlevel,whileregulatorynotalwaysalignintermsofemissionsfactorsandrequirementsaremorelikelytotargetthefacilityprovidedifferentcalculationmethodsthatcreateorcorporatelevel.EmissionsMeasurementinSupplyChains:BusinessRealitiesandChallenges12comparabilityissuesacrossproductionroutes.30“green”(orlow-carbon)steel,whichgetsnopriceThereisnoharmonizationofproduct-levelreportingpremiumatthisstage.standardseither.31HeterogeneityinproductionandLimitedreportingdecarbonizationpathwaysIndustryexpertsinterviewedforthispaperDifferencesintechnologiesandproductionexpressedconcernthattheabsenceofcommonprocesses,theirenvironmentalimpactandmeasurementstandardswouldcomplicatetheprospectsfordecarbonizationarefactorsthatimplementationofnewregulatoryrequirements–explainwhyitismoredifficulttoconvergeonincludingthoselinkedtofinancialdisclosure,duecommoncarbonmeasurementstandardsindiligencereporting,theEU’semissionstradingthesteelindustry.32Asinglestandardwouldscheme(ETS)andCBAM.Thecurrentlandscapeneedtocoverboththeprimaryandsecondaryalsofailstoequipsteelmakerstoaccuratelyroutes,whilealsoconsideringtheconstraintsinundertakeScope3reportingforincreasedresourceavailability.However,asoneintervieweeinvestorandbuyerinterest(linkedtoSBTitargetnoted,theremightbeseveraldefinitionsandsetting).Finally,differencesinmeasurementmethodologies,butwhatisimportantisthemethodsandincompletereportingarealsoancomparabilityoftheunderlyingdatacollectedandobstacletothedevelopmentofnewstandardsfortheinteroperabilityacrossdefinitions.Wecan’tspendanotherhalfdecadeonhowtomeasurecarbonemissions.Weneedtogetonwithitandagreeonthecornerstones…Itwouldbeadisservicetotheworldandtheindustryifwearestilldiscussinghowtomeasurecarbonin2030.LeadingsteelmanufacturerEmissionsMeasurementinSupplyChains:BusinessRealitiesandChallenges132ImplicationsPublic-privatecooperationisessentialforwell-functioningmeasurementsystemsthatbalanceaccuracyandfeasibilityandareinteroperable.EmissionsMeasurementinSupplyChains:BusinessRealitiesandChallenges14Policy-makersmustcarefullynavigatethequestionSupply-chainemissionsmeasurementobligationsofemissionsmeasurementacrosssupplychains.couldalsoemergeasnon-tariffbarriersIncreasedvisibilityofsupply-chainemissionscansincesupplierswillhavetohelpfirmssatisfymakeacriticalcontributiontoefficient,market-basedfinancialdisclosureandduediligencereportingapproachestodecarbonizingtheglobaleconomy.Itrequirements.Smallfirmsmayfindimplementationcaninformcorporatedecisionsaroundprocurement,prohibitivelycostlyandpoorercountriesmayfindproductdesign,R&Dandinvestment.Greatervisibilitythemselveswithoutmarketaccess.Widespreadonsupply-chainemissionscouldalsoenablemoreindustrytarget-settingaroundScope3couldhaveeffectivepolicysupportforgreenproducts,throughasimilareffect.economicincentives,publicprocurementrequirementsandtradepreferences.ThesepromisescannotbeInthecaseofmeasuresimposedbygovernments,realizedifmarketactorsareunabletomeetreportingtheWorldTradeOrganization’s(WTO)Technicalrequirements,oriftheresultingdataarenottrustworthy.BarrierstoTrade(TBT)Agreementallowsmemberstochallengetechnicalregulations,ItcanbecostlyanddifficulttoobtainaccuratestandardsandconformityassessmentScope3emissionsestimates,andtheavailableproceduresasdiscriminatoryormoretradeestimatescanvarydependingonchoicesmaderestrictivethannecessarytofulfilalegitimatearounddefinitions,boundaries,materialityandpublicpolicyobjective(suchastheprotectionmeasurementapproaches,amongotherfactors.oftheenvironment).Toavoidsuchoutcomes,Thisvariabilitywillchallengetradepolicy-makersmembersareencouragedtobasetheirmeasuresifsupply-chainemissionsareusedasabasisforoninternationallyrecognizedstandards.33WTOmarketaccessorpreferences,asisthecasewithcommitteescanfunctionasforumstodiscusstheEU’sCBAMincertaininstances.emergingregulation.342.1Featuresofwell-functioningmeasurementsystemsWell-functioning,interoperablesystemsforparticularlyforSMEsandfirmsindevelopingmeasuringsupplychainemissionscanbeenablerscountries.Someintervieweesnoteddiminishingfordecarbonizingtheglobaleconomy.Thispaperreturnsafterapoint,andthatthecostandhasidentifiedthefollowingimportantfeaturesofpersonneltimespentonmeasuringandreportingsuchsystems,recognizingthattheremaybetrade-shouldnotbecomeadistractionfromtheactualoffsamongthem.workofdecarbonizingsupplychains.InformationtechnologysolutionsareneededtofacilitatetheAccuracyexchangeandcomparabilityofdata.ThoughtshouldbegivenandsupportprovidedtoAccurateestimateswouldmakeitpossibletocapacity-buildingprogrammesforexportersinbenchmarksuppliers,andtotrackfirms’progressdevelopingeconomies.indecarbonizingtheirownactivitiesandtheirsupplychains.TheywouldallowfirmsandgovernmentsInteroperabilitytointegratecarbonfootprintsintoprocurementprocessesandwouldempowerconsumerstoStandardizedmethodologiesandinteroperablemakemoresustainablechoices.Accuratedatatechnicalsystemsforexchangingcarbonwouldalsofacilitatefirms’accesstofinance.Byfootprintdataarecriticalinfrastructureonthecontrast,buildingareportingsystemaroundweakpathtonet-zeroemissions.Thebasicoutlinedatacarriesimportantrisks:firmsandfinancialofastandardizedsystemisinplace,notablyintermediariescouldbeaccusedofgreenwashing,throughtheGHGProtocolandISOstandards.andconsumersandvoterscouldlosetrust.Atthesametime,theexistingstandardsstillleavemanytechnicalquestionsunanswered,andFeasibilitydifferentanswersleadtoinconsistentemissionsestimates.MoreworkisneededtomakesurethatCostsandtimespentonmeasuringandreportingvariousapproachestomeasureemissionsareshouldremainmanageableforcompanies,interoperableacrossindustries.EmissionsMeasurementinSupplyChains:BusinessRealitiesandChallenges152.2ExistinginitiativespointintherightdirectionSeveralindustryinitiativeshaveemergedtoandQualityAssessmentforSustainability).38helptacklethesechallenges.Inchemicals,Europeanchemicalproducersnowhavemuchforexample,TogetherforSustainability(TfS)bettervisibilityontheemissionsmanagementhasdevelopeddetailedguidanceforproductperformanceoftheirlogisticsserviceproviders.carbonfootprintsofchemicalproducts35andispilotingadata-sharingsolutiontoenablefirmsInothersectorssuchassteel,however,progresshasintheindustrytosafelyshareupstreamcarbonbeenslowsofar.Intheagri-foodsector,too,differentfootprintdata.Inlogistics,theSmartFreightcalculationmethodsco-exist,whichcurrentlymakesCentre’sGlobalLogisticsEmissionsCouncilitdifficulttomakemeaningfulcomparisons.(GLEC)36hassimilarlydevelopedaframeworktoharmonizethecalculationoflogisticsemissionsHowever,acrossthesupplychain,effortsareacrossdifferentmodesoftransport.TheSmartunderwaytoimproveemissionsmeasurement.ForFreightCentreandtheEuropeanChemicalexample,thePartnershipforCarbonTransparencyIndustryCouncil(Cefic)havecollaboratedon(PACT),hostedbytheWorldBusinessCouncilforspecificguidanceonemissionsmeasurementSustainableDevelopment(WBCSD),hasdevelopedforEuropeanchemicalstransportandlogistics.37cross-sectoralguidanceforemissionsreportingCeficincludedtheseemissionmeasurementbestalongsupplychains,andisalsoworkingtoensurepracticesinitsassessmentschemeSQAS(Safetyinteroperabilityoftechnologicalsolutions.39Policy-makersdonotsufficientlyunderstandwhatishappening.Thisisanewlanguagetothem.Thenexusoftradeandsustainabilityisincreasinglyimportant,andpolicy-makersarenotreallyawareofhowfastthingsarechanging.Leadingdairyprocessor2.3KeyquestionsforfuturedialogueThefollowingrepresentasetofkeyquestionsHowcangovernmentsencouragepolicy-makersandabroadercommunitymayinteroperability?wishtoconsiderinthisareagoingforward.–InteroperabilityacrossindustriesandcountriesHowtostriketherightbalancebetweeniskey.Thereisatrade-offbetweenaccountingaccuracyandfeasibility?fordifferencesandspecificitiesofeachsector,andhavingsimplemethodsthatcanbeapplied–Arelativelyaccuratemeasureofcarbonacrossproducts,firmsandcountries.Onceemissionsalongsupplychainsisusefulbutconvergencehasbeenachievedinoneindustry,mustbeweighedagainstcostsandpracticalthereshouldbe“interfaces”tootherindustriesrealitiesindifferentsectorsandcontexts.Effortsandtheirownconvergedstandards.PACTandtoimprovethemeasurementofsupply-chainCOMETmayserveasexamples.emissionsshouldnotbecomeadistractionfromtheactualworkofdecarbonization.–Whenintroducingregulationsthattouchuponemissionsmeasurement(carbonHowcangovernmentssupportthemarkets,financialdisclosure,carbontaxesdevelopmentofcommonstandards?orborderadjustments,duediligence,etc.),governmentsshouldbuildonexisting–Governmentsmaynotneedtotakealeadingroleapproachesandstandards,andengageinstandard-settingwhereindustryconvergencewiththeprivatesectorandcivilsocietyemerges.Whereitdoesn’t,technicaldiscussionsorganizations,tomaximizeinteroperability.withtheprivatesectorinanintergovernmentalformatcouldbetheanswer,takingintoconsiderationscientificandcivilsocietyinput.EmissionsMeasurementinSupplyChains:BusinessRealitiesandChallenges16Howwillreportingbeverified?theseactorsdecarbonize.Ifnot,theycouldleadtonegativeimpactsonlivelihoods–andlittle–Independentverificationofreportedemissionsimpactondecarbonization.willbeimportantforregulatorycompliance,andtoprovidecredibledatatobusinesspartners,Howcandigitaltoolshelp?investorsandcivilsocietystakeholders.Thispointstoagrowingroleforconformity–Onewaytoreconcileaccuracyandfeasibilityassessmentandassuranceproviders(e.g.inmeasuringsupply-chainemissionsisauditors,andtesting,inspectionandcertificationthroughdigitaltoolswhichautomateas(TIC)companies).muchaspossiblethenecessarycalculationsanddatatransmissions.ThesetoolscanHowcanSMEsandfirmsindevelopingalsoprovideanaudittrailforverification.countriesbesupported?IndustryinitiativessuchasTfSandPACTrecognizetheimportanceofanecosystem–Theimpactofemissionsmeasurementandofinteroperabledigitaltools.Policy-makers,reportingobligations(dejureanddefacto)ontoo,shouldstudyhowdigitaltoolscanbeSMEsandonfirmsindevelopingcountriesusedtofacilitatecompliancewithmandatoryshouldnotbeunderestimated.Ifmanageddisclosure.Whereindustryisunabletowellandtransparently,withadequatesupportconvergeonadataexchangestandard,andflexibilities,thegrowingtrendtowardsgovernmentsshouldorganizetechnicalmeasuringsupply-chainemissionscouldhelpdiscussionswithrelevantstakeholders.EmissionsMeasurementinSupplyChains:BusinessRealitiesandChallenges17ContributorsBusinessatOECD(BIAC)ReviewersDominikKümmerleFlorianAnderhuberPolicyDirectorandStrategicCommunications,DirectorEnergy&Climate,Euromines,BelgiumBusinessattheOECD,BIAC,ParisJoséAntônioSilveiraFerreiraHanniRosenbaumEnvironmentandSustainability,MarfrigGlobalBusinessattheOECD,BIAC,ParisFoodsSA,BrazilOrganisationforEconomicTzutzuyRamirezHernandezCo-operationandDevelopmentHeadofClimateandNature,SyngentaGroup,(OECD)SwitzerlandCemreBalabanAndrewKempsonTradePolicyAnalyst,TradeandAgricultureGeneralManager–GlobalClimatePolicy,FonterraDirectorate,OECD,ParisCo-operativeGroupLimited,NewZealandKoenDeconinckIlariaMarcheseEconomist/PolicyAnalyst,TradeandAgricultureEconomicAnalyst,Nestlé,SwitzerlandDirectorate,OECD,ParisHelenMedinaMarionJansenSeniorPublicAffairsManager,GovernmentandDirector,TradeandAgricultureDirectorate,OECD,MultilateralRelations,Nestlé,SwitzerlandParisDominicNewburySébastienMiroudotSustainableSourcingManager,SyngentaGroup,SeniorTradePolicyAnalyst,TradeandAgricultureSwitzerlandDirectorate,OECD,ParisLeandroAlvesRosaSustainabilitySpecialist,Marfrig,BrazilWorldEconomicForumArmenStepanyanManager,EnvironmentandClimateChange,ArcelorMittalLimited,UnitedKingdomKimberleyBotwrightStéphaneTondoHeadofSustainableTrade,WorldEconomicForum,ClimateChange/GovernmentAffairs,ArcelorMittalGenevaEurope,LuxembourgAditiVergheseThedocumenthasalsobenefittedfromthereviewPolicyLead,InternationalTradeandInvestment,andcontributionsofseveralBusinessatOECDWorldEconomicForum,Geneva(BIAC)members.EmissionsMeasurementinSupplyChains:BusinessRealitiesandChallenges18Endnotes1.Quoteshavebeentakenfrominterviewswithbusinessrepresentatives.Theirinsightshavebeenanonymizedandaggregated,wherenecessary,toallowopenexchange.2.TheGHGProtocolCorporateValueChain(Scope3)AccountingandReportingStandardprovidesfurtherdetailonthecategoriesandguidanceforreporting.SeeGreenhouseGasProtocol,“CorporateValueChain(Scope3)Standard,2011”,https://ghgprotocol.org/corporate-value-chain-scope-3-standard.3.CDP,“CDPTechnicalNote:RelevanceofScope3CategoriesbySector”,https://cdn.cdp.net/cdp-production/cms/guidance_docs/pdfs/000/003/504/original/CDP-technical-note-scope-3-relevance-by-sector.pdf.4.ISO,“ISO14067:2018Greenhousegases—Carbonfootprintofproducts—Requirementsandguidelinesforquantification”,2018,https://www.iso.org/standard/71206.html.5.EURLex,“CommissionImplementingRegulation(EU)2023/1773”,17August2023,C/2023/5512,http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_impl/2023/1773/oj.OtherregulatorydevelopmentsincludeEUproposalstoban“greenwashing”,e.g.byrestrictingtheuseoftermssuchas“carbonneutral”.Seehttps://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20230918IPR05412/eu-to-ban-greenwashing-and-improve-consumer-information-on-product-durability.6.EuropeanCommission,“CommissionImplementingRegulation(EU)2023/1773of17August2023layingdowntherulesfortheapplicationofRegulation(EU)2023/956oftheEuropeanParliamentandoftheCouncilasregardsreportingobligationsforthepurposesofthecarbonborderadjustmentmechanismduringthetransitionalperiod”,17August2023,https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ%3AJOL_2023_228_R_0006;EuropeanCommission,“CarbonBorderAdjustmentMechanism”,https://taxation-customs.ec.europa.eu/carbon-border-adjustment-mechanism_en#resources.7.EuropeanCommission,ImplementingRegulation,Articles4-5.8.WorldEconomicForum,“Net-ZeroChallenge:Thesupplychainopportunity”,21January2021,https://www.weforum.org/reports/net-zero-challenge-the-supply-chain-opportunity.9.CDP,“CDPTechnicalNote:RelevanceofScope3CategoriesbySector”,https://cdn.cdp.net/cdp-production/cms/guidance_docs/pdfs/000/003/504/original/CDP-technical-note-scope-3-relevance-by-sector.pdf.10.Ibid.11.Crippa,M.etal,“FoodsystemsareresponsibleforathirdofglobalanthropogenicGHGemissions”,NatureFood,pp.198-209,2021,https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-021-00225-9.12.Deconinck,K.etal,“Fastandfurious:theriseofenvironmentalimpactreportinginfoodsystems”,EuropeanReviewofAgriculturalEconomics,pp.1310-1337,2023,https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbad018.13.GreenhouseGasProtocol,“AgricultureGuidance”,https://ghgprotocol.org/agriculture-guidance,accessedon17September2023.14.GreenhouseGasProtocol,“LandSectorandRemovalsGuidance,”https://ghgprotocol.org/land-sector-and-removals-guidance,accessedon19September2023.15.InternationalDairyFederation,“BulletinoftheIDFN°520/2022:TheIDFglobalCarbonFootprintstandardforthedairysector”,https://shop.fil-idf.org/products/the-idf-global-carbon-footprint-standard-for-the-dairy-sector,accessedon19September2023;GlobalRoundtableforSustainableBeef,“GRSBBeefCarbonFootprintGuideline,”https://grsbeef.org/grsb-beef-carbon-footprint-guideline/,accessedon19September2023.16.Lowder,S.K.etal,“Whichfarmsfeedtheworldandhasfarmlandbecomemoreconcentrated?”,WorldDevelopment,pp.105455,2021,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105455.17.Deconinck,K.etal,“Fastandfurious:theriseofenvironmentalimpactreportinginfoodsystems”,EuropeanReviewofAgriculturalEconomics,pp.1310-1337,2023,https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbad018.18.Delevingne,L.etal,“Climateriskanddecarbonization:WhateveryminingCEOneedstoknow”,McKinsey&Company,28January2020,https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/sustainability/our-insights/climate-risk-and-decarbonization-what-every-mining-ceo-needs-to-know#/.19.InternationalEnergyAgency(IEA),“TheRoleofCriticalMineralsinCleanEnergyTransitions”,2022.20.CarbonDisclosureProject,“RelevanceofScope3CategoriesbySector”,CDPTechnicalNote,CDP-technical-note-scope-3-relevance-by-sector.pdf.21.RMI,“CoalitiononMaterialsEmissionsTransparency(COMET):AcceleratingDecarbonizationbyEstablishingCarbonTransparency”,https://rmi.org/our-work/climate-intelligence/supply-chain-emissions-initiative/comet.22.SBTi,“SBTiCriteriaandRecommendationsforNear-TermTargets”,https://sciencebasedtargets.org/resources/files/SBTi-criteria.pdf.23.IEA,“EmissionsMeasurementandDataCollectionforaNetZeroSteelIndustry”,https://www.iea.org/reports/emissions-measurement-and-data-collection-for-a-net-zero-steel-industry.24.OECD,“Addressingsteeldecarbonisation:challengesforindustryandpolicy”,interimreport,2023.EmissionsMeasurementinSupplyChains:BusinessRealitiesandChallenges1925.WorldSteelAssociation,“Climatechangeandtheproductionofironandsteel”,https://worldsteel.org/climate-action/climate-change-and-the-production-of-iron-and-steel/.26.WorldSteelAssociation,“December2021crudesteelproductionand2021globalcrudesteelproductiontotals”,25January2022,https://worldsteel.org/media-centre/press-releases/2022/december-2021-crude-steel-production-and-2021-global-totals/.27.GlobalEnergyMonitor,“GlobalSteelPlantTracker”,https://globalenergymonitor.org/projects/global-steel-plant-tracker/.28.H2GreenSteel,“H2GreenSteelraises€1.5billioninequitytobuildtheworld’sfirstgreensteelplant”,7September2023,https://www.h2greensteel.com/latestnews/h2-green-steel-raises-15-billion-in-equity-to-build-the-worlds-first-green-steel-plantnbsp.29.WorldSteelAssociation,“OurPerformance:SustainabilityIndicators”,https://worldsteel.org/steel-topics/sustainability/sustainability-indicators/.30.Biberman,J.etal,“ConflictsBetweenGHGAccountingMethodologiesintheSteelIndustry”,ColumbiaCenteronSustainableInvestment,pp.12-2022.31.Inadditiontosite-levelorproduction-basedmeasurementmethodologies,thereareproduct-levelstandardsdevelopedbyworldsteel(LifeCycleInventory),ISO(20915series)andResponsibleSteel.32.OECD,“Theheterogeneityofsteeldecarbonizationpathways”,Reportpreparedforthe2023JapanesePresidencyoftheG7,https://read.oecd.org/10.1787/fab00709-en?format=pdf.33.WTO,AgreementonTechnicalBarrierstoTrade,Art.2,https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/17-tbt_e.htm.FormoreonhowtheWTO’sTBTAgreementcancontributetoemissionstandardsandclimatechangemitigation,seeWTO,“TradeandClimateChange:InformationBriefNo.6”,https://www.wto.org/english/news_e/news21_e/clim_03nov21-6_e.pdf.34.FormoreonhowtheWTO’sTBTAgreementcancontributetoemissionstandardsandclimatechangemitigation,seeWTO,“TradeandClimateChange:InformationBriefNo.6”,https://www.wto.org/english/news_e/news21_e/clim_03nov21-6_e.pdf.35.TogetherforSustainability,“TheProductCarbonFootprintGuidelinefortheChemicalIndustry”,Version2.0,2022,https://www.tfs-initiative.com/app/uploads/2023/04/TfS_PCF_guidelines_2022_English.pdf.36.SmartFreightCentre,“TheGLECFramework”,https://www.smartfreightcentre.org/en/our-programs/global-logistics-emissions-council/calculate-report-glec-framework/.37.CeficandSmartFreightCentre,“CalculatingGHGtransportandlogisticsemissionsfortheEuropeanChemicalIndustry”,September2021,https://cefic.org/app/uploads/2021/09/Calculating-GHG-transport-and-logistics-emissions-for-the-European-Chemical-Industry-Guidance.pdf.38.Safety&QualityAssessmentforSustainability(SQAS),https://www.sqas.org/.39.PACT,“PathfinderFramework”,https://www.carbon-transparency.com/our-approach/pathfinder-framework.EmissionsMeasurementinSupplyChains:BusinessRealitiesandChallenges20TheWorldEconomicForum,committedtoimprovingthestateoftheworld,istheInternationalOrganizationforPublic-PrivateCooperation.TheForumengagestheforemostpolitical,businessandotherleadersofsocietytoshapeglobal,regionalandindustryagendas.WorldEconomicForum91–93routedelaCapiteCH-1223Cologny/GenevaSwitzerlandTel.:+41(0)228691212Fax:+41(0)227862744contact@weforum.orgwww.weforum.org

1、当您付费下载文档后,您只拥有了使用权限,并不意味着购买了版权,文档只能用于自身使用,不得用于其他商业用途(如 [转卖]进行直接盈利或[编辑后售卖]进行间接盈利)。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。
3、如文档内容存在违规,或者侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权等,请点击“违规举报”。

碎片内容

碳中和
已认证
内容提供者

碳中和

确认删除?
回到顶部
微信客服
  • 管理员微信
QQ客服
  • QQ客服点击这里给我发消息
客服邮箱